Except it isnt an historic fact because the Beakers didnt “wipe them out”. They were absorbed into Beaker culture over hundreds of years due to migration.
And Beaker is a cultural phenomenon, not a race of people. Those Beaker people on the island of Ireland were not necessarily genetically related to those on the continent.
And even if they did wipe them out, the Beakers were not a single unified people under one flag and one leader like the Brits. Why would people living far off on an island off the west coast of Europe have anything to do with the actions of people on the continent just because they make similiar pottery?
We document this phenomenon most clearly in Britain, where the spread of the Beaker complex introduced high levels of steppe-related ancestry and was associated with the replacement of approximately 90% of Britain’s gene pool within a few hundred years, continuing the east-to-west expansion that had brought steppe-related ancestry into central and northern Europe over the previous centuries.
You said it was the largest genocide in European history. I asked you to prove that and you didnt. Your source doesn’t even mention genocide.
They wiped out 90% of the population you plank
Your source doesnt say that either. The part you yourself highlighted says:
steppe-related ancestry and was associated with the replacement of approximately 90% of Britain’s gene pool within a few hundred years.
Genetic replacement doesn’t mean genocide you plank. And it doesnt mean “ThEy WiPeD tHeM oUt!!!” either. That’s why genocide isn’t mentioned anywhere in the article you sourced.
The only plank here is you. You’ve made it very clear that you don’t actually know what genocide means. Genocide has a specific definition. So why don’t you look up what that is before you make a fool of yourself any further?
Except it isnt an historic fact because the Beakers didnt “wipe them out”. They were absorbed into Beaker culture over hundreds of years due to migration.
And Beaker is a cultural phenomenon, not a race of people. Those Beaker people on the island of Ireland were not necessarily genetically related to those on the continent.
And even if they did wipe them out, the Beakers were not a single unified people under one flag and one leader like the Brits. Why would people living far off on an island off the west coast of Europe have anything to do with the actions of people on the continent just because they make similiar pottery?
Your comparison is ridiculous.
They did wipe them out. They colonised them.
Colonised by the fictional Beaker Empire that you made up?
No, the beakers wiped out the Neolithic people. Largest European genocide in history.
The Irish are the purest genetic descendants of the Beakers.
Then provide a source that shows that the genocide you made up by the Beaker Empire you made up was larger than the holocaust.
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/129642
Doesnt say genocide anywhere. And it doesnt say it was larger than the holocaust either.
Congrats. You disproved yourself.
They wiped out 90% of the population you plank
You said it was the largest genocide in European history. I asked you to prove that and you didnt. Your source doesn’t even mention genocide.
Your source doesnt say that either. The part you yourself highlighted says:
Genetic replacement doesn’t mean genocide you plank. And it doesnt mean “ThEy WiPeD tHeM oUt!!!” either. That’s why genocide isn’t mentioned anywhere in the article you sourced.
The only plank here is you. You’ve made it very clear that you don’t actually know what genocide means. Genocide has a specific definition. So why don’t you look up what that is before you make a fool of yourself any further?