Wurzl@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoChina’s Huawei branded a criminal enterprise as tech firm’s US trial openswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1139arrow-down16
arrow-up1133arrow-down1external-linkChina’s Huawei branded a criminal enterprise as tech firm’s US trial openswww.theguardian.comWurzl@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squaredhork@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-216 hours agoYou noticed that his text followed a common AI pattern. I replied, basically, with “So what? He’s responsible for it regardless”. The legal stuff is relevant because he is a lawyer and is discussing it in the courtroom.
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·16 hours agoYou don’t find it at all embarassing or noteworthy that a law firm likely charging hundreds if not thousands of dollars per billable hour is outputting chatbot dialogue? I do. And I want to live in a world where that is professionally unacceptable.
minus-squaredhork@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agoI think those firms justify their bill rates by results, not by a literary analysis of their filings.
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agoYes, and then they bill by the hour.
You noticed that his text followed a common AI pattern. I replied, basically, with “So what? He’s responsible for it regardless”.
The legal stuff is relevant because he is a lawyer and is discussing it in the courtroom.
You don’t find it at all embarassing or noteworthy that a law firm likely charging hundreds if not thousands of dollars per billable hour is outputting chatbot dialogue?
I do. And I want to live in a world where that is professionally unacceptable.
I think those firms justify their bill rates by results, not by a literary analysis of their filings.
Yes, and then they bill by the hour.