• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Again, there is a place for this and its that thread. I’m not going to report you but expect what you are doing is bannable here. You have many options in terms of threads you can pick up on to make that comment.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

      No NSFW content

      No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading.

        But whatever. I you’d like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don’t think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts.

            Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they’re in the wrong? That it doesn’t matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong?

            Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did.

            Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right.

            • Maeve@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                What do you mean by a lucky guess? I’m unclear what you mean. Also, you’ve made no case. If your case is “I believe I’m right, therefore I’m right”, I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn’t take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she’s going to be in trouble with the law.

                From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence.