• postman@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I know the answer is in the article but the headline doesn’t make clear if Netflix sued or are being sued. My 2 cents.

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        “Netflix [had] sued” is as reasonable as “Netflix [was] sued,” is it not?

        Edit: love it when you make a reasonable point and wind up with zero replies but exactly one downvote. Such a funny little experience, these moments are.

        • Nelots@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Had/was kinda implied this is a thing that happened a while ago. They could probably do something like “Netflix suing for…” and “Netflix being sued for…”, but the confusion is probably intentional for clicks.

              • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Too true, but when you see a kid crying about their spilled ice cream, do you go “Haha, cry harder dipshit!” Ice cream doesn’t matter, right?

                Or should you just be kind to others as your starting point?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nice catch. I read it as “was sued” vs “has sued” without noticing. I should read more carefully.