“He’s a bot.” - Person with 3 posts since 2025.

DISCLAIMER: This account may exhibit unusual levels of activity due to actually using Lemmy. Any reports that I am a bot were filed by Reddit agent provocateurs that want to have no content on lemmy.

  • 792 Posts
  • 183 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 5th, 2026

help-circle

  • not just multiple! allegedly - they say Iran destroyed 8 F-15 planes and 1 A-10 in a single strike on the ground.

    And Houthis just did a literal blietzkrieg TODAY - and took several islands, huge territory and an important port - and no news outlets covering this.

    This is complete failure of US intelligence and US navy, This is total failure of republican led military. how can you control the seas and let thta happen?

    and guess what - red sea - closed. our fleet will have to sail back around Afrika now - I kid you not























  • Jesus Christ, everyone here seems to have invented their own definition of what Lemmy is.

    Lemmy doesn’t have competitors. It isn’t competing. It isn’t what you think it is.

    Except the actual Lemmy developers describe it as:

    “a decentralized alternative to Reddit and other link aggregators”

    They’ve been calling it a Reddit alternative since at least 2020.

    So no, I’m not imposing some imaginary “corporate framing” onto Lemmy. I’m using basically the same framing its own developers used to explain why they built it.

    And “there is no manager or corporate goal” doesn’t mean adoption suddenly becomes meaningless. If you’re building an alternative to corporate-controlled link aggregators, whether anybody actually adopts the alternative fucking matters.

    Otherwise what are we celebrating? Software existing?

    And that’s why 35k MAU matters to me. Reddit has spent years handing alternatives opportunities on a silver platter, and Lemmy hasn’t capitalized on them.

    You can personally define success as “35k enthusiasts are happy.” Fine.

    But stop pretending your definition of Lemmy is the official one while telling everyone else “you don’t understand what Lemmy is.” Even the developers explicitly called it a Reddit alternative.

    https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy

    Lemmy is similar to sites like Reddit, Lobste.rs, or Hacker News: you subscribe to forums you’re interested in, post links and discussions, then vote, and comment on them. Behind the scenes, it is very different; anyone can easily run a server, and all these servers are federated (think email), and connected to the same universe, called the Fediverse.

    For a link aggregator, this means a user registered on one server can subscribe to forums on any other server, and can have discussions with users registered elsewhere.

    It is an easily self-hostable, decentralized alternative to Reddit and other link aggregators, outside of their corporate control and meddling.







  • Some of us consider [data disappearing] a good thing.

    I love to have privacy. I hate when im forcible deplatformed and decontented. hate hate it.

    Choosing to delete your data is privacy. Losing it because an admin had no working backup is data loss. Those are completely different things. If you want to burn your account every year, great. But someone else may have spent five years writing troubleshooting guides, moderating a community, or building useful discussions. They should be able to expect their home instance to have a backup.

    I thought you were a repost bot when I first saw your content.

    I created two new accounts and both were banned after roughly 10 posts overnight. No warning. No “hey, are you automating this?” No request to slow down or tag the account. Just assumption --> bot/spam -> ban.

    Also - automation is not even fucking illegal on lemmy.world!!! do people not realize that?

    Note that reddit does not do that. post as much as the fuck you want. Imagine new lemmy user doing this and just getting banned. wth. resson for 35k MAU

    I haven’t personally experienced any file size limits

    External hosting isn’t a substitute for local media hosting. Hotlinking gets blocked all the time, URLs expire or posts get removed. Authentication gets added. Hosts disappear. HTTP headers and referrer policies break embeds. Some major platforms deliberately make direct linking difficult.

    If I want media attached to a post to remain available, the reliable option is for the instance to actually host a copy., 5 MB is tiny for modern media.

    Are you suggesting that people with post history should be immune to bans?

    hell No. Obviously if someone posts CSAM, malware, threats, or other illegal content, remove it and ban them.

    I’m talking about proportionality.

    If somebody has contributed hundreds of legitimate posts for months and then an admin decides their posting volume is too expensive, banning the account and wiping everything they’ve contributed is insane infrastructure management.

    And on the other extreme, I had brand-new accounts banned after around 10 posts simply because admins apparently decided they looked like bots.

    There’s a gigantic spectrum between “do nothing” and “nuke the account.”

    not even a warning? not even a pm? ffs really? Rate-limit them. Remove the offending posts. Temporarily suspend them. Communicate.

    A ban system existing doesn’t mean every problem requires the maximum penalty.

    I don’t concern myself with who can see my posts.

    up to you, you are you. federation is a social network. Most people posting to communities presumably want other people to see and interact with what they post.

    An entire instance suddenly becoming unable to interact with another instance is absolutely relevant to those users.

    “content” is ephemeral. What are you actually losing?

    Potentially years of knowledge.

    You actually gave the perfect example yourself: that obscure six-year-old troubleshooting post that solves somebody’s problem.

    Today’s shitpost is disposable. Today’s detailed technical answer might be somebody’s Google result five years from now.

    The whole point I’m making is that users should get to decide what’s disposable, not discover that their instance admin decided it for them by never setting up backups.