not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 天前so much winninglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1167arrow-down14
arrow-up1163arrow-down1imageso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 天前message-square14fedilink
minus-squareBlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·16 天前The graph is still approaching zero, it’s only stable because it’s so close already
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·16 天前It is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale. A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
minus-squarenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-216 天前it went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·16 天前That’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.
The graph is still approaching zero, it’s only stable because it’s so close already
It is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale.
A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
it went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
That’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.