Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 23 天前Unicorn cakelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square197fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down148
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageUnicorn cakelemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 23 天前message-square197fedilink
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·22 天前I have no idea what you’re on about
minus-squareBitchPeas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-222 天前You claim that because the woman would be hungry again, the action was meaningless. We all get hungry again. It doesn’t diminish that we ate before. Or that we must eat again, even though we just ate. I am drawing a line between this fatalistic black and white thinking of “well then it’s pointless” to my own experience with mental illness. Chunking is a cognitive technique which orders information or tasks into smaller segments in order to avoid being overwhelmed.
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·22 天前https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sarcasm
minus-squareJoeBigelow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·22 天前 Its a joke bro That’s all I see
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-222 天前Ah yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it Damn, got me bro
minus-squareJoeBigelow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·22 天前I don’t understand why you’re trying to justify being perceived as a jerk
minus-squareBitchPeas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-222 天前Oooh. Your joke wasn’t very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time. Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right. It just wasn’t a very clearly executed joke. A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity. And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
minus-squareBitchPeas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·22 天前https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
I have no idea what you’re on about
You claim that because the woman would be hungry again, the action was meaningless.
We all get hungry again. It doesn’t diminish that we ate before. Or that we must eat again, even though we just ate.
I am drawing a line between this fatalistic black and white thinking of “well then it’s pointless” to my own experience with mental illness.
Chunking is a cognitive technique which orders information or tasks into smaller segments in order to avoid being overwhelmed.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sarcasm
That’s all I see
Ah yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it
Damn, got me bro
I don’t understand why you’re trying to justify being perceived as a jerk
Oooh. Your joke wasn’t very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time.
Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right.
It just wasn’t a very clearly executed joke.
A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity.
And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law