• SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Ah yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it

      Damn, got me bro

      • BitchPeas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Oooh. Your joke wasn’t very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time.

        Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right.

        It just wasn’t a very clearly executed joke.

        A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity.

        And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law