Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 2 months agoUnicorn cakelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square195fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down148
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageUnicorn cakelemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square195fedilink
minus-squareJoeBigelow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months ago Its a joke bro That’s all I see
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-22 months agoAh yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it Damn, got me bro
minus-squareJoeBigelow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoI don’t understand why you’re trying to justify being perceived as a jerk
minus-squareBitchPeas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-22 months agoOooh. Your joke wasn’t very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time. Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right. It just wasn’t a very clearly executed joke. A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity. And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
That’s all I see
Ah yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it
Damn, got me bro
I don’t understand why you’re trying to justify being perceived as a jerk
Oooh. Your joke wasn’t very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time.
Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right.
It just wasn’t a very clearly executed joke.
A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity.
And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law