• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 个月前

      “In theory”, if one of those angles equals exactly 90 deg. But “in reality”, nothing will ever truly measure exactly 90 deg. Best you’re going to get is 90.0000-something. Reality doesn’t work in absolutes…only approximates. Some are more accurate than others, but none are perfect.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 个月前

        Reminds me of that Rick and Morty episode with the perfectly level floor. At a certain point in reality you also would need perfect tools to check if something is perfect. Measuring the stick so to speak. I believe it is theoretically possible to get perfect angles, but keeping it that way might be a challenge outside of a vacuum. As a thought experiment, if you take your arm, hold it straight, then bend it, for 1 picosecond or something, wouldn’t the angle of your arm be exactly 180.000~°, 90.000~°, etc, as it is bending?

      • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 个月前

        If a triangle oscillates from having an angle greater than 90 deg to less than 90 deg, there has to be a moment where it equaled exactly 90 per the hairy ball theorem

        • ttayh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 个月前

          Oh but you see (you fool!) you used the word theorem, ergo, by your own admission, this only works in theory! Hoisted by your own petard! - Archangel1313, probably