A no-kill shelter will send animals to another shelter if they cannot house all the animals.
In reality they just killed the animals instead of the other shelter doing it for them.
I agree a no-kill shelter shouldn’t kill. But if you think that giving an animal to a no-kill shelter is goIng to guarantee that animal lives a full life you’ll be sadly disappointed.
A bullet to the back of the head is a good death, I don’t get the outrage. It’s better than the standard practice of a co2 gas chamber.
You don’t see an issue with a no-kill shelter, which takes in funding because it’s a no-kill shelter, killing the animals under their care?
A no-kill shelter will send animals to another shelter if they cannot house all the animals.
In reality they just killed the animals instead of the other shelter doing it for them.
I agree a no-kill shelter shouldn’t kill. But if you think that giving an animal to a no-kill shelter is goIng to guarantee that animal lives a full life you’ll be sadly disappointed.
We’re talking about funding though