• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    Because this law is about places that do not have signs. It’s the question of, “I have a gun and want to go into a store, but there is no sign saying “no guns” and I can’t find the owner. Who do I talk to so I can get agreement to come into the store?” This is not banning “no guns allowed” signs. It’s about having to ask permission of a person who may not even live in the state to enter a place that the public is allowed to enter.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I fucking hate people in this country.

      Like “leave the gun in your fucking car you freak” isn’t an option?

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I totally agree. I’m just saying the ruling isn’t insane. The people who feel like they need to carry a gun everywhere they go might be insane, but having a law that says a person can’t enter a public space without checking for permission to follow their constitutional right isn’t a good law.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      but the Texas law means you have to locate the owner AND ask for detailed sales records to determine if a business makes more than 50% of its revenue on alcohol.