You definitely interpret people wanting the Iranian people to succeed vs the Iranian regime. Good on you for getting the nuance completely correct without a single ounce of error on your part. Terrific job.
This is the regime all these Iran apologists on Lemmy are rooting for
No one is rooting for this regime to succeed. We are rooting for the innocent citizens who were killed by an illegal American invasion and also believe that Iran doesn’t deserve to be invaded illegally.
Nope. Just got here. But this thread alone destroys your theory. Not to mention your cherry picked comments that apparently means everyone supports Iran.
If everyone on Lemmy supports Iran, why do you support Iran?
Since you cant decypher sarcasm (you cant seem to make sense of it, you admitted), your premise is “people want the iranian regime to succeed” which is a straw man. You need to do a steel man instead. You have no founded argument because you chose to do a straw man instead of a steel man.
If you have any trouble interpreting or comprehending that let me know.
You definitely interpret people wanting the Iranian people to succeed vs the Iranian regime. Good on you for getting the nuance completely correct without a single ounce of error on your part. Terrific job.
Try to find an actual mistake in my reasoning rather than sarcastic nonsense
No one is rooting for this regime to succeed. We are rooting for the innocent citizens who were killed by an illegal American invasion and also believe that Iran doesn’t deserve to be invaded illegally.
No one? Really? Have you been to Lemmy before?
Nope. Just got here. But this thread alone destroys your theory. Not to mention your cherry picked comments that apparently means everyone supports Iran.
If everyone on Lemmy supports Iran, why do you support Iran?
Everyone? Quote me please
Your premise is flawed. You can’t have a founded argument with a flawed premise.
You still can’t do it…. Maybe try to find out how it is flawed
Since you cant decypher sarcasm (you cant seem to make sense of it, you admitted), your premise is “people want the iranian regime to succeed” which is a straw man. You need to do a steel man instead. You have no founded argument because you chose to do a straw man instead of a steel man.
If you have any trouble interpreting or comprehending that let me know.