Hi, I wanted to try Debian but i found out that its foundation relies heavily on systemd. I’m using a Lenovo Ideapad 500-15isk that’s why I want to be away from systemd’s bloat, I’m still not an advanced user but i had Ubuntu + KDE for 2 Years (GUI only) then used CachyOS + Hyprland(Caelestia shell) for 1.5 years ( Used Terminal more than GUI). This time I want to make the OS usage as low as possible but also not old/ugly. Thank you in advance.

  • juipeltje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m not sure how much of a difference it would make in terms of resource usages to ditch systemd, but what i can say is that Void is a great distro. Runit boots blazingly fast, xbps is probably no joke the fastest package manager i’ve ever used, but also very robust and can handle very outdated systems just fine. I’ve never tried Devuan so i don’t have an opinion on it.

  • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You “found out” it relies on systemd and systemd is bloated? Which bloat exactly are you talking about?

  • ranzispa@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I doubt Debian requires systemd in order to work. However I do not see what your problem is with systemd, do you have an example of problems caused by the bloat?

    It is very light on the system and a much better way to handle services that the old init scripts. If you want to reduce system resources usage I’d look somewhere else. You are likely to save a few MB of ram and some cycles of your cpu by removing systemd, but I doubt any significant amount.

    • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Debian uses systemd exclusively for init. The distros op listed are some of the only ones that remain that do not force it.

      I agree with the rest of what you said ;)

  • setfacl@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m running Devuan + Enlightenment on an old chromebook with a 16g drive and 4g ram. It’s perfectly usable for everything except big PWAs like Gmail.

  • Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Devuan has the easy repos like Debian, it’s a pretty straight forward fork, as is AntiX.

    Void is great, but a bit more complicated, not LFS insane complicated but like Arch/Gentoo “Git good noob” complicated.

    Really, any is good, and I’m looking at moving from Debian to AntiX.

    Good choice, though…

    Systemd is a mess, and the main guy is one of those obnoxious tech bro types who doesn’t listen to anyone and slaps crap in for no reason aside from his own ego. Everyone should be moving away from it, for many reasons.

    • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The main issue is that nobody is able to come up with anything better. I use systemd because it made my job hugely easier and soved many problems. The main guy is an asshole but his work is good when you use it as he intended, which kind of is the point of open source.

      If you don’t like it you fork and do your own thing, until now nobody bothered, and this is telling.

      Poettering did respectable work in snarky fields like audio and init nobody wanted to do something in and everybody complained about. I respect that despite he behaving like a spoiled asshole

  • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    It seems like my Windows installation was using over 4 Gb of RAM to just do absolutely nothing. Now I can be doing multiple things with Arch and systemd and it’s about 2.1 Gb unless I’m gaming or something. Do people using the older init functions actually perform even better? That would be wild! If so, I might need to grab a copy of Artix or try OpenBSD again. I had a Linux usage gap and just don’t recall the resource pull from old init any longer. My first installation was on a machine with a Windows XP dual boot. I think it was an x32 processor rather than an x32-x64. You could run those on just 4 Gb. Maybe even 2.

  • cattywampus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    If you want system usages to be as low as possible you can skip a GUI all together, just use viu, mpv, w3m and such or you can look into projects like DSL (damn small Linux) and puppy Linux. If you’re trying to maintain a mostly normal experience you can look into efficiencies in compiling your kernel and software a la Gentoo.