• daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    I saw a video of the guy crying in his car after confronting the people who kidnapped his dog and sold it.

    Heartbreaking. He might just go John wick on their ass.

    They stole his beloved pet and sold it to be slaughtered.

    Most people see their pets as family. How would you feel if someone did that to your pet or family member you loved?

    It’s enough to make someone go on a vengeance spree. It really is.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe china should focus its governmental might on stopping illegal meat butchers instead of stopping gay people from using public spaces.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      6 days ago

      A) It’s not illegal. It’s a dog, it’s a valid meat source in most regions of the world.

      B) You’re severely misunderstanding (or were made to misunderstand) China’s LGBT stance. You can be gay in public (hell Chongqing would be under martial law if that were illegal), you cannot make pornography. That’s the only rule, and that also applies to straight content. The only LGBT crackdowns that have happened have been porn crack downs that happened to include, not specifically target just include, LGBT content creators.

      There’s more openly gay people in China than there are gay people in the entire Western world bro.

      • Oascany@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        China treats LGBT folks equally to cishets.

        Looks inside

        No gay marriage

        So the definition of systemic homophobia. Not even the bare minimum.

        • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          6 days ago

          No, they can just legally join in partnership and have all of the same government incentives as married people… They just don’t call it marriage since marriage is for incentivizing procreation.

          • Oascany@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            People would do that? Just go on the internet and tell lies?

            https://legalclarity.org/is-gay-marriage-legal-in-china-rights-and-options/

            And let’s live in the alternate reality you’re talking about for a minute. Can two straight people get married in China with no intention of procreation? Can two gay people get married if they’re planning to adopt? Can they even adopt? Come on man, I get being wrong, but don’t double down on it.

            • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              6 days ago

              And let’s live in the alternate reality you’re talking about for a minute

              We’ve been in reality for quite a bit.

              Can two straight people get married in China with no intention of procreation?

              It’d be really, really weird culturally and a huge risk most aren’t willing to take. Also if you’re a straight foreigner marrying a chinese national your application will almost certainly be denied if you state you’re not willing to have kids, since that’ll be seen as a fake marriage trying to gain Chinese spousal residency.

              Can two gay people get married if they’re planning to adopt?

              Since they can enter into a mutual guardianship and adopt yes? You people get tripped up on the word ‘Marriage’ way too much. A rephrasing would be can two gay people cohabitate, share full financial resources, get tax breaks, and adopt? Sure. Can they get ‘married’? No. The difference is entirely without substance at this point, but because Stalin was so incredibly anti-gay, we’re still suffering through the lasting ‘but that’s not the right way’ nonsense cultural war he started so you can’t call it marriage.

              Can they even adopt?

              Yes.

              Come on man, I get being wrong, but don’t double down on it.

              I live here half the year, dumbass. You are objectively the incorrect one, in anything you say about China.

              • davetortoise@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Would two gay men in guardianship refer to each other as their ‘husband’ (i.e. the word that a heterosexual couple would use), or is there a different word for it? Not trying to be argumentative just curious how closely guardianship is culturally associated with marriage.

                • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  It entirely depends on the couple and region, 老公 (basically husband, most commonly heard between long time girlfriends to their boyfriends) is common enough to count, but 情人 can and is also used, which is closer to ‘lover’ but is used for any type of close intimate relationship including cishet married couples.

            • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Nope Guardianship is available country-wide (I can’t find an english language document that goes into more recent updates which allow property and tax breaks.) Beijing, Hong Kong, and the entire province of Taiwan all recognize marriages from outside of china though, which is where that gets confused.

              Unfortunately the overall chinese public isn’t really up to voting for more explicitly stated parity of rights due to a lack of educational push in that direction, which is compounded by the general public’s lack of interest, and so on.

      • binux@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        you cannot make pornography. That’s the only rule

        Nope, that’s categorically false in every possible way, even if we’re being pedantic. For the sake of informing those who might have been misled by this (since I have little doubt you’re being intentionally disingenuous as campists often are) Here’s a couple relevant excerpts from the Wikipedia article on LGBTQ rights in China:

        [LGBTQ] people in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) face legal and social challenges that are not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. While both male and female same-sex sexual activity are legal, same-sex couples are currently unable to marry or adopt, and households headed by such couples are ineligible for the same legal protections available to heterosexual couples. No explicit anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ people are present in its legal system, nor do hate crime laws cover sexual orientation or gender identity.

        Under Chinese Communist Party (CCP) general secretary Xi Jinping, LGBTQ venues and events have been forced to shut and LGBTQ rights activists have become subject to greater scrutiny by the country’s system of mass surveillance. The CCP increasingly considers LGBTQ advocacy the work of "foreign forces”. LGBTQ content is censored. Authors of boys’ love works are routinely arrested and criminally prosecuted.

          • binux@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            You didn’t, silly. You said being gay isn’t illegal, which sure, is conditionally true, but neither was being a free black person in post-slavery America, and yet we hopefully both know how that demographic was treated then, if not even now.

            Besides, my goal isn’t to address something you did before me, but to point out how, intentionally or not, you’re leaving out very important info that lays out the mis-or-disinformative nature of your point. You can’t talk about the quality of a book if you’ve only read a single chapter.

            Anyway, feel free to continue implying something along the lines of me being on the payroll of the all-powerful capitalist oligarchs of the world or something. It’ll really help your point.

        • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 days ago

          Feel free to engage with the conversation if you believe that any of my counter claims are wrong. Breaking community and lemmy.world global rules isn’t a smart way to do that.

          Claims made:

          Dog meat isn’t illegal, except in some provinces.

          Being LGBT publicly isn’t illegal.

          Which also includes linked to the claims about Chongqing, since it’s incredibly well known (along with Chengdu, of course.)

          The only LGBT crackdowns that have happened have been porn crack downs that happened to include, not specifically target just include, LGBT content creators.

          • Lumisal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 days ago
            1. you didn’t say “except in some provinces”, therefore your first little white lie

            2. North Korea allows voting, and in the USA it’s legal to criticize Trump in front of ICE. Most people will get the point I’m making with that, but I’m sure it’ll go over your head.

            • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              6 days ago
              1. “except in some regions of the world” covers that in my opinion, and honestly I forgot that foreigners pressured the local governments in a couple of places to ban dog meat after covid. This covers less than 10% of the Chinese population, and isn’t relevant to the story, but at least this is an actual criticism this time. Congrats.

              2. Except unlike your Trump example, I’ve actually provided evidence the propaganda your masters told you to believe is wrong. The ban is on pornography. Yes China had an anti-lgbt period that it’s still getting over in the public consciousness, which is a serious topic that needs actual nuance and good faith attempts at understanding to discuss, and I’m happy to go into that to educate you if you would like as it’s actually super interesting. What does not happen is the boogeyman tracking down gay people in their own homes doing gay things.

              The official stance held by the central government and all city and province governments is “gay people are people, why discriminate like the west does”

              • Lumisal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                Lol I like how you completely ignored I mentioned North Korea too. Guess it’s because it’s also Tankie land

                • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Because it’s not relevant to this or any other discussion and we’ll never agree on anything related to North Korea if you cannot even accept easily verifiable facts that go against your owners’ narrative on China.

  • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Billions of animals murdered for food every year: 😊
    Celebrity doggo eaten: 🤬😤😡

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      “We eat large mammalian quadrupeds, so we’re civilised. They eat large mammalian quadrupeds, so they’re barbaric”

      Being mad they eat bugs is basically chauvanism too, but at least it’s taxonomically coherent.

      Honestly dog meat is on it’s way out just from Western influence anyway.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Makes me wonder if there is some kind of food shortage we’re not hearing about. Eating dogs is one thing, but the stealing of pets to use as meat sounds like a form of desperation.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nah, I don’t think people on a bike stealing a dog care if it was a pet or not.

      Our dog is a rescue from South Korea and seemed to be from a dog farm, as well as our friends dog was for sure rescued from a dog meat producer.

      They have a different view of what is acceptable eating animals in the East compared to West.

      So a random dog in a field seems like easy prey.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not really from China, they produce around 1.5x the rice they need per year and that’s guaranteed for the domestic market; export market rice is taxed and measured differently. That plus the pig towers really covers most the common nutritional needs. They’re also one of the richest countries on Earth and tend to import plenty of superfluent foods, which isn’t an earmark of a starving nation. Somalia isn’t importing billions of tonnes of soybeans.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Doesn’t mean the food is reaching more rural areas, like where this dog was butchered. If an area is seeing pets being kidnapped to use as meat, that is not a good sign of food stability.

        • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          The rural areas where the food is grown and subsidized by the government so they don’t even really pay for food staples and only pay for what needs to be imported into the region (note: imported, not given by the government)?

          This isn’t the 1950s li’l bro. China has a agriculture first economy. There’s a reason there has been no famine in China since the great leap forward despite a complete lack of foreign food aid even during the poorest periods in modern Chinese history.

          There are, of course as in all societies, criminals. Criminals steal things that will sell. I don’t suggest that the methheads selling their food stamps via buying food and selling it to strangers for half price suggest a food shortage in the US. I don’t even suggest the multiple hundreds of livestock mutilations with clearly man-made wounds that have been such an incredible staple in the American culture that they’ve inspired countless jokes and even documentaries about how ‘aliens’ are doing it are a sign of food shortage.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I don’t suggest that the methheads selling their food stamps via buying food and selling it to strangers for half price suggest a food shortage in the US.

            I mean you should suggest that, because thats exactly what it is. People can’t afford food, so they are seeking out lower cost alternatives. It is a sign of a food crisis. Just like people kidnapping pets to sell for food is a sign of a food crisis.

            • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Except it’s not. The reason the methheads do it is because they know they can still get food and they get meth instead. If they just used the food stamps for food they’d have an incredible excess. The reason people buy the half priced food is because that frees up money for the other bills imposed on them by private companies. That’s not a food crisis, there’s not a lack of food.

              In this story not only is there not a lack of food, people are paying MORE MONEY in order to eat dog than other meats. Pork is cheaper than dog everywhere both are sold, which for pork is the entire country. The dog was sold to a restaurant, which brings UP THE PRICE OF FOOD. The dog wasn’t stolen to be eaten out of need, which the thief would have just done themselves.

              Alternative story with the same cause and effect without the western attachment to a specific livestock as a pet: Celebrity pet Ayam Cemani Chicken stolen and sold to restaruant.

      • justastranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Wealth inequality in China is rapidly approaching levels found in America. The bottom 50% of Chinese people collectively hold 6% of the wealth, with the top 10% holding 68% of the wealth. Which leads to some extreme regional poverty.

        • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The regional poverty has dropped. Drastically. Unlike the US, a rising tide lifts all boats.

          Does more work need to be done? Sure. But food insecurity isn’t a thing in China. Ever. You are guaranteed income, land, food, and farming supplies if you live in a rural area. Is it a lot compared to the top of the top? No, not really. But it’s infinitely better to be poor in China than in the US. Every poor rural Chinese person is either a land holder or is in the household of a land holder. Tax free as well under specific income thresh holds.

          Remember they are taking a society that 35 years ago was the poorest and most populated country on Earth and have so far raised median living standards above all of their neighbors. There is of course more to go, because most of the country has yet to be industrialized. Hence the ‘Ghost Cities’

          • titanicx@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I like how you downvoted for honesty. When you look at the state of the poor in the United States driving down the road and saying that they’re relegated to an RV lifestyle if they’re rich enough to be that poor. Or if they simply are living on the streets and whatever makeshift home they can muster or if you see him just pass out on the side of the road on the concrete or wherever they ended up just literally collapsing at. And yet China bad.

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Am I missing something?

    Nothing in the article itself suggests that we know what happened to the dog after it was stolen other than the headline.

    The article just ends after this part:

    Guo cut short his trip and rushed back to China to search for him.

    Checking the archive didn’t turn up any more of the article.

  • Vandalismo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m sorry but this line is so absurd i can’t stop laughing

    Anyway, this is a matter on the levels of disable someone