• Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    We are producing enough food (and clothes, and appliances, etc., etc.) for 10 billion people, and the planet is burning. It is not sustainable long term. And, by “long term”, I don’t mean “the next 20 years”, I mean “the next 100-200 years”.

    And the “manufactured crisis” of population decline hits really hard if you’re 12 and have no clue how the retirement system works.

    They arrive at the right conclusion (capitalism is currently the cause of all suffering), but through completely stupid reasoning.

    • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We are producing enough food (and clothes, and appliances, etc., etc.) for 10 billion people, and the planet is burning. It is not sustainable long term.

      That’s not necessarily true. How much of our overall greenhouse emissions come from which sector?

      From this chart, decarbonizing electricity and transport will go a long, long way, and decarbonizing manufacturing and construction could also give some room to reduce overall emissions by more than the entire agricultural sector produces.

      And it’s not just some kind of pipe dream. We’re doing real work at decarbonizing electricity, heat, transport, shipping, construction, etc., as the prices of low or zero emissions options start to outcompete the higher emission options for many applications.

      Plus if the data center boom crashes as a bubble, a lot of the infrastructure investment into increasing energy production and distribution with both high carbon and low carbon sources will at least have financed a lot of low carbon energy and the potential for curtailing the least carbon efficient generation methods.