• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    But twitch is owned by Amazon and frankly they can and do moderate Twitch streams.

    This is not supposed to be a discouragement of politicians connecting with the public via any means necessary.

    I just want to point out the flawed logic of saying news media is owned by billionaires so it can’t be trusted, but twitch, also owned by a billionaire can somehow be trusted.

    • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They aren’t yet putting up barriers since their sole purpose is people connecting to each other. There is every chance they do move to restricting access but I think it would be the death of Twitch and certainly Twitter if they started doing so. Social media doesn’t require us to trust some group of people to choose our content for us and as such is a lot less prone to that bias and billionaire control. That isn’t to say the billionaires don’t have an effect, on Twitter what people are exposed to by the algorithm is very intentional and controlled as is the front page roll on Twitch, but unlike mainstream media its still possiblr to see and connect with the unfavoured content and grass roots movements can still form. I would prefer this was all on the fediverse but its not where the people are yet.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I use twitch. It doesn’t take much at all to get a ban of any kind. I’ve seen twitch streamers get banned mid stream. I think this stream in particular is likely to attract a lot of people who disagree with his political leanings and want to troll. It’ll be heavily modded and there are likely to be topics that will not be discussed because they’re problematic enough that a troll could use twitch’s own guidelines against the stream.