Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoMost could work on anyone reallylemmy.worldimagemessage-square225fedilinkarrow-up1567arrow-down199
arrow-up1468arrow-down1imageMost could work on anyone reallylemmy.worldReturn_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square225fedilink
minus-squaredrunkpostdisaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up40arrow-down3·3 days agoSo be a cunt to someone for no reason pisses them off?
minus-squareAnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down1·3 days agoI mean, that is the definition of ragebaiting
minus-squarestickly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·3 days agoI think rage baiting requires some degree of deniability and subterfuge. The “[normal question] if you were athletic?” is a good example. The ones that are just “Shut up short man” are too crass
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·3 days agocrass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait
minus-squareNerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoRelax, its not that deep.
minus-squareramenshaman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·3 days agoThat’s such a short guy thing to say
So be a cunt to someone for no reason pisses them off?
I mean, that is the definition of ragebaiting
I think rage baiting requires some degree of deniability and subterfuge. The “[normal question] if you were athletic?” is a good example. The ones that are just “Shut up short man” are too crass
crass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait
Nah you got it wrong
Relax, its not that deep.
That’s such a short guy thing to say