• ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    As if anyone outside those states could distinguish between unlabelled outlines of Virginia, Kentucky, and North Carolina.

    Or New Hampshire and Vermont.

    I guess Connecticut pulled a pro gamer move by being a tiny rectangle.

      • CMLVI@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Virginia has a similar shape tho, if not more chicken-like because it’s larger on the meaty portion

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Virginia isn’t curved in on the bottom right like the chicken.

          Virginia looks like a half baked cookie that is lopsided.

          • CMLVI@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I do tend to ignore the flat bottoms of both KY and VA, I’m thinking more of the “divot” before the meaty part of the leg occurs being more prominent in VA, whereas KY is a uniform-ish slope.

            Maybe a 1a and 1b situation for “States shaped like poultry” ranking lol

        • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I guess I’m just too familiar with the shape of Virginia? The hole where West Virginia broke off gives it away too.

          • CMLVI@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I feel like that’s what enhances it? Lol I think of a chicken leg as like…skinny bone with a bulb on the end, and VA has more of that imo. KY ends up being more like a uniform line until it gets to the think part. 🍗 shape. I also just mean I’m reference to the shape itself, not as a memory tool. I’m from WV so I loooove the void we left in VA lol

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “I’m bad at geography, so everyone else must be too” is a take for sure XD

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Are you sure “Americans aren’t bad at geography” isn’t more of a take?

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      As if anyone outside those states could distinguish between unlabelled outlines of Virginia, Kentucky, and North Carolina.

      Self-reporting, because this is shit we learn in like 3rd grade in the US and that adults should (albeit aren’t expected to) be able to do. NH and Vermont I could tell you but mainly because I reassemble their little 69 in my head as a memory aid. (A sane memory aid without needing to remember “big end bottom” or “big end top” is that NH’s small vertical end is super narrow compared to its large one.)

      Whereas Wyoming and Colorado – presented separately in a void with no scale – I could only tell because Wyoming is nearly a perfect rectangle while Colorado is an isosceles trapezoid (just very slightly). That’s one you basically have to just memorize via a top/bottom relationship.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It was mostly a joke, I didn’t think people would get so worked up.

        But yeah, I’ll stand by the assertion that most Americans aren’t great at geography, and some states have non-distinct shapes that aren’t rectangles.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I’d say I can kind of see someone getting Kentucky and Virginia mixed up, so I guess here are some general tips, throwing spaghetti at the wall so maybe it helps someone:

          • Virginia’s hump is a lot taller (absolutely and proportionately) than Kentucky’s.
          • Virginia is a Sonic the Hedgehog OC with peninsulas spikes coming off the back of its hump.
          • If you get it in the outline, Virginia has a small peninsula off its main east coast, called the “Eastern Shore of Virginia”, which forms the tongue of the Delmarva Peninsula.
          • The elongate part of Virginia is sharp like a knife, while that of Kentucky is pretty blunt and bumpy like a fist. So Kentucky do the grabbo, Virginia do the stabbo.
    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      When i was in school, there was a web game that we were allowed to play where you had a blank map of the US and had to drag the states to the right spot. The states did not snap into place.

      It was jarring how many students couldn’t even get the states surrounding us right, and I’m in Texas. Like, I didn’t get it 100% right because New England is a bitch, but I could get over 90%.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I think I played that same game back in the day. And yeah, when you have the context added by building out from the distinctly shaped border states, it’s fairly easy to get almost all of them, but I don’t expect the average American to be sure if they’re looking at Indiana or Illinois based on nothing but the shape of its outline.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Rivers clearly demark the boundary for anyone without GPS or other means of determining a precise location. Same as hills and mountain ranges, which are also common boundaries.

      The fact that some rivers can wander and people tend to bold cities across rivers is a thing against them, but people build across any kind of boundary.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Rivers are natural points for cities, almost every city not on the coast is on the river because that’s how it was originally settled. So to have half the city in one state and the other half of the city in the other state is absurd. People build across anything but again cities are naturally on rivers.

        Economically the immediate area on both sides of a river are going to be similar, so you should have the same administration. It’s when you get away from the river that this changes and you might want different administration.