• GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, I’m saying it’s rational. I’m not suggesting it’s right. It doesn’t solve anything, killing more people won’t bring his family back and ultimately will only justify more violence. It’s an embrace of nihilism by someone who has nothing left to care about but petty vengeance.

    What I’m saying is, if you start from the assumption nothing matters, then it is perfectly reasonable. I reject the premise, but the conclusion is logical for someone who doesn’t. Strip a person of everything that matters to them, and they have no reason not to seek the cold comfort of vengeance against whomever they can access.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It’s quite literally NOT RATIONAL to attack other Innocents for revenge of the death of Innocents.

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          No.

          If you want to hurt the not innocent, then hurt those people directly. Not other Innocents. Anyone who thinks otherwise is human shit.

          • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Again, I don’t disagree that it’s wrong. I disagree that it’s irrational. Words mean things.