Angela Lipps spent nearly six months in jail in Tennessee and North Dakota after being misidentified by Fargo police through AI facial recognition in a bank fraud investigation.
vendors certainly deserve a share for convincing cops their shit is flawless.
here’s another example, where the cops trusted the casino AI face matching over the guy’s own identifications (plural, all kinds of IDs on him and he had a CDL etc.,)
Yes, the vendors share part of the blame.
The AI doesn’t.
Edit for clarification: AI can’t share any blame. It’s a computer program.
The company that makes it is fully responsible for what it does, and the cops are responsible for believing its output over actual proof.
You’ve completely missed the point. Nobody is saying that AI is fine and trustworthy.
How do you propose to punish software? How are you going to compel compensation, retribution, or justice from a computer program? It’s not possible. Nor should one even try - because it wasn’t AI that arrested her, it wasn’t AI that left her in jail for months, it wasn’t AI that fucked her over. It was cops that trusted shitty AI.
AI sucks - nobody in this thread is arguing against that. There’s lots of shitty software, though. The problem with AI is that is that those in power are trusting people’s lives with it and people are getting fucked because of it. If you’re focusing on the software, you’re excusing the cops.
No, cops jailed her!
AI can’t put handcuffs on a person.
It can’t even make a decision.
Stop deflecting the blame.
vendors certainly deserve a share for convincing cops their shit is flawless.
here’s another example, where the cops trusted the casino AI face matching over the guy’s own identifications (plural, all kinds of IDs on him and he had a CDL etc.,)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPUBXN2Fd_E
Yes, the vendors share part of the blame.
The AI doesn’t.
Edit for clarification: AI can’t share any blame. It’s a computer program.
The company that makes it is fully responsible for what it does, and the cops are responsible for believing its output over actual proof.
boy you really stan for shitty code don’t you? the AI did nothing wrong, it’s only bad people.
guess what buddy: simping for AI isn’t going to save you. What a pickme tho lol… jfc
You completely, utterly misunderstood my comment.
What do you propose? Put the AI on trial for false imprisonment?
nah man, open your horizons. there’s plenty of blame to go around.
You’ve completely missed the point. Nobody is saying that AI is fine and trustworthy.
How do you propose to punish software? How are you going to compel compensation, retribution, or justice from a computer program? It’s not possible. Nor should one even try - because it wasn’t AI that arrested her, it wasn’t AI that left her in jail for months, it wasn’t AI that fucked her over. It was cops that trusted shitty AI.
AI sucks - nobody in this thread is arguing against that. There’s lots of shitty software, though. The problem with AI is that is that those in power are trusting people’s lives with it and people are getting fucked because of it. If you’re focusing on the software, you’re excusing the cops.
tazer the servers repeatedly while screaming “STOP RESISTING”
Your lack of imagination is sad.
ACAB