• PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now, some tech job candidates have begun asking about what AI compute budget they will have access to if they decide to join. “I am increasingly asked during candidate interviews how much dedicated inference compute they will have to build with Codex,” Thibault Sottiaux, engineering lead at OpenAI’s Codex, the startup’s AI coding service, wrote on X recently.

    Big fucking bullshit. No one ever ask for “AI compute budget”, people wants money. Not your coffee, not your foosball game, money.

    Guess what you can buy with money? Yeah, that compute time, if desired.

    What a fucking load of bullshit.

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They are talking about like internal quotas I believe? Like my friends company is limited to 1000 in spend per month while I have no cap and will blow through 2k in a week if I’m working long hours.

  • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    So let me get this straight. Companies were like “instead of paying one senior dev 300k and 5 junior devs 150k, we can get rid of all the junior devs and give the senior dev AI to do all of the legwork thus saving us 750k.”

    And then they found out that AI costs money. So instead of ponying up the 100k in tokens for the senior dev to to their job, they are saying “Hey senior dev, we are taking away your bonus and replacing it with tokens! You can take it or be out of a job, because we refuse to keep anybody on board who doesn’t use AI to replace 5 junior devs”

    So these cheap fucks saved 750k, and are upset with the fact that they might only save 650k?

    While also destroying the planet to generate shitty code.

    I fucking hate this time line.

  • bebabalula@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Company that sells random collections of words: People are increasingly asking for random collections of words instead of money!

  • entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Corporate owned media promoting a story about making you rely on tokens to outwork your coworkers so you don’t lose your job is the dumbest shit I’ve ever read.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gee guys… Did you maybe build a whole bunch of compute capacity for a product no one actually wants, and now you have to find a way to use it for something?

  • ChadGPT2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember when silicon valley used to build products that would help people improve their lives.

    The reaper or capitalist enshittification comes for all industries eventually.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The chief marketing officer for AI, Bill Ofgoods, thinks this is a great idea and the CFO, Peg Inapoke, agrees. Brooklyn Bridge was unavailable for comment

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    3 days ago

    OpenAI exec highlights the rising importance of AI compute in tech job compensation.

    In other news, Roblox executive thinks that having companies pay employees partly in Robux would be a great idea.

    • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It’s a really dumb way to frame what the OpenAI people actually said on this - they are saying that the people applying to them want to know how many tokens they can use as a tool to accomplish the job they are applying for. There’s a fundamental difference to compensation here to compensation, where tokens as compensation would be how many tokens the people applying for the job would be able to utilize for their own purposes, whatever they may be.

      To illustrate - I would probably be reluctant to work for a company which would not be willing to spend the amount of money that would get me a more or less top of the line computer with which to perform my job. Not because I consider my company-provided development machine as a part of my compensation - it is merely a tool I use for my job.

      The people applying for these jobs are the kinds of people who think that burning an exorbitant amount of tokens will make them quite significantly more productive, so the metaphor of having the best tools available to accomplish the task at hand extends here, in accordance with their belief system.

      There’s then the quote from the VC ghouls, but I don’t think anyone could accuse them of being competent to any significant degree, so their quotes are most appropriately used as toilet paper.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Sorry, my mortgage servicer doesn’t accept AI slop as payment, so I’ll just take the money”