I clarify:

Let’s say scientists can’t come up with solutions to global problems, AI gets out of control and turns almost everyone into paperclips during wars, and in the 2040s or 2050s, the surviving people (about a few tens of millions around the world or even less) gradually return to the level of intelligence of their distant ancestors?

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As we can see from what is happening in the world today my answer is nothing. We will do nothing and just accept our fate.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    mad max world is probably likely, or a 4400 type of civilization, where the rich are in thier bougie clean enclaves, while everyone is the devastate mad max style living.

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can cook over a wood fire and teach others the same. I can do carpentry with un-powered hand tools to an acceptable level. I am a pretty decent archer. Hopefully I could find a group of survivors who valued those skills over my delicious flesh.

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I take unbridge with the line

    Level of intelligence of their distant ancestors

    All evidence so far points to humans being at the same intelligence levels as they are now since basically when we first became Anatomically Modern Humans.

    We were not less intelligent, we just had less information and less data.

    You can be a Supergenius the likes of which only seen in comic books, but if you don’t have the right data and information, you’re no different to anyone else.

    • deadymouse@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As you have well noticed, I did not take into account that human evolution did not advance much intellectually and computationally, it was rather a matter of the variety of information that sharpened the human mind, to put it simply. Unfortunately, it is difficult to take all this into account.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        A fun example of that, there’s been time and again where prototypes of things we now think of as modern were made thousands of years before. But they didn’t have the prerequisite tools and information to make it anything more than a prototype.

        Like “Hero’s Engine”, a thousand of years old toy that’s a fully working Bronze Steam Engine, but it’s basically like 10cm in size. But cause they weren’t good enough at metallurgy yet, they knew it could work bigger but didn’t have any methods to make it bigger (copper and bronze can’t handle the strain that anything bigger than that would make, and that’s all they knew how to use at the time)

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        We didn’t advance in intelligence, at all, as that’s “the capacity for, with information and tools, find a way to put them to use”. And the human mind is as sharp as it’s always been.

        We had less information, and because of that no knowledge of how to make better tools, but if you gave someone from 5000 years ago the information and tools, they would be intelligent enough to figure out how to use them without instruction.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          There are also issues of societal specialization leading to the ability of individuals to specialize in gaining knowledge, instead of 100% of the population working 99% of the time on survival.

          But my brain and Og the Caveman are basically the same.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let’s say scientists can’t come up with solutions to global problems

    We already have the solution, the French made it in the 1800. We just lack the will to use them again.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Yeah if 10’s million survive that’s only 0.1%. Almost all of us are dead in this scenario.

  • HorikBrun@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean…the short is answer is “die” almost certainly from unclean water, for at least 60% of the general western population.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah that’s always been my assumption. My retirement plan is essentially to just be eaten by cannibals within about 24 hours of everything going full Mad Max.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    So many depressed people on Lemmy, everyone just going with dying huh?

    I mean I am excited to finally flex my creativity, see if there is anything I can figure out how to do with all our crap and the new world. Maybe some kind of silly The Grinch level home full of housing code violations and crazy contraptions made of garbage while I cross breed pea/beans.

    It would be cool if when I die people thought of me as some weird hermit alchemist and as they wander through my house finding tools of the old world uncover a lost truth and then some YA type shit happens as a result.

    Dying is easy, we all do it eventually, the question is, if you do anything before you get to the same finish line.

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well given the extinction of more than a half million essential crop species and the previously universal knowledge of farming that occurred in the last century. Expect to die alongside billions of others.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t see us regressing before 1820. Will just be back to your horses, carriages, and living off the land.

        • stickly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Afaik that can only be recycled with pretty energy intensive arc furnaces or regular fossil fuel combustion. No accessible fossil fuel limits you to fallout style scrap-tech, which is probably not sustainable for a long term 17-18th century civilization.

  • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Our distant ancestors had just as much capacity for learning as we do, they just used it in different ways because that was what the nature of their daily lives demanded. Where we can recognize dozens of brands by their logo alone, they recognized plants by their leaves, useful stones, and scat. Our accumulated knowledge we pass on doesn’t make any one of us any “smarter”. Some of us alive today are not rocket scientists but have the capacity to be, just as there were people thousands of years ago that had that capacity but not the thousands of years of science and engineering that was needed to build on to take that last step and achieve it.

    Solitary living is a luxury made easier by the abundance of technology we have, going it alone in a Stone Age state would be very, very difficult, then and now. Folks who understand things like tool making, agriculture, medicinal plant identification, bushcraft, animal husbandry, hunting/fishing/trap making, and clothing making would have a leg up. Those who have all that and the ability to form small cooperative groups would stand an even greater chance of success. I’d also throw out that despite the rise of digital storage, we have a lot, a lot of printed material in the world. Even if we forget how to read, there’s pictures and illustrations. Kids aren’t raised in isolation, knowledge (even diluted knowledge) gets passed on, and we wouldn’t forget where we once were, and the ruins of civilization would be all around. You’d almost need some sort of sci-fi level disease to wipe all of our minds to get us back to true Stone Age levels of living and prevent us from understanding how scavenged tools could be used. We might forget how to forge steel but we’d keep scavenging it for blades rather than revert to stone.

    • deadymouse@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not a bad idea, but it will be better in mountainous areas, it is safer there, since predators will not climb there, because there is no food for them there.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        You’re assuming I’m America, UK don’t have any predators larger than a cat left, all went extinct.

        It’s part of why we’ve got a Deer problem and have to manually cull them every now and again

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    All the people saying, “I’d just die,” remember that neolithic peoples (hell, all people up to the present day) rely on social bonds. You don’t have to possess every survival skill, just enough skills to be an asset to a community of mutual-support.

    I already educate children, and regardless of society’s form I’d probably continue to do so because it’s vitally important. Also as someone well-practiced in a variety of handicrafts, I suspect I’d find my niche quite comfortably. Making useful things from limited resources, teaching others how to make such things, and teaching children the knowledge I’ve accumulated throughout my life, I think there’s bound to be a place in a stone age community for someone like me.