Yeah nice meme. But where in this reply chain did I give you the impression that I was hurt or angry in any way? You’re not very good at this, are you? This is getting really embarrassing really fast.
By the fact that all you have is “no I didnt say some of Israel bombs were necessary” when you very clearly did lol. There isnt even an attempt at arguing, its just “nuh-uuuh”
See, that only shows you can’t read. See you mentioned I agree with genocidal bombs. I asked you to tell me where. You came up with a sentence where I did not. So I told you to keep looking.
I also told you that I know what I wrote (twice actually) and you responded by “I highlighted it for you”, showing once more that you simply can’t read. So please, double down and even triple down on an idiotic point that you can’t back up for the life of you. And by the entirety of this thread showing that you would be the lowest number in a room temperature IQ contest. On a Celsius scale.
Any bomb by pissrahell is a genocidal bomb lol, their raison d’etre is settlerism. There is no military action they undertook that wasn’t either to grab more land or defend what they had already stolen. The fact that you think I didn’t understand what you meant shows how self assured you are in your stupidity.
So there never was a terrorist threat to Israeli citizens?
I am now even more convinced that you don’t understand what I mean. Or just don’t want to because you’ve dug down too much and are unable to see the fact that you may have been wrong in your initial analysis of the comment.
Perhaps you should get off your high horse and think about what someone really means instead of trying to bait them like a fucking MAGAt and crying like a little bitch when that doesn’t work out for you.
Because they always argue in bad faith based on a surface level reading of headlines. It’s always the same story. I see a “tankie” citing research, statistics, historical texts on one side, and on the other I see someone like you, floundering. It’s embarrassing, and a waste of time, because you’re not in this in good faith. You never really engage with the arguments. So what’s the point?
Please show me where the tankie cited research, statistics or historical texts.
You’re embarrassing yourself here. And you’re not in good faith either. I am in absolutely the best of faiths and have not made a single bad faith argument in this entire thread. Get off your high horse. You don’t own the truth.
No there never was. There was a threat to pissrahelli settlers sure, but I don’t consider a threat to terrorists terrorism. I perfectly understood you’re commenr from the beginnig. You think the zionist entity has a right to defend it’s stolen land.
Yeah nice meme. But where in this reply chain did I give you the impression that I was hurt or angry in any way? You’re not very good at this, are you? This is getting really embarrassing really fast.
By the fact that all you have is “no I didnt say some of Israel bombs were necessary” when you very clearly did lol. There isnt even an attempt at arguing, its just “nuh-uuuh”
See, that only shows you can’t read. See you mentioned I agree with genocidal bombs. I asked you to tell me where. You came up with a sentence where I did not. So I told you to keep looking.
I also told you that I know what I wrote (twice actually) and you responded by “I highlighted it for you”, showing once more that you simply can’t read. So please, double down and even triple down on an idiotic point that you can’t back up for the life of you. And by the entirety of this thread showing that you would be the lowest number in a room temperature IQ contest. On a Celsius scale.
Any bomb by pissrahell is a genocidal bomb lol, their raison d’etre is settlerism. There is no military action they undertook that wasn’t either to grab more land or defend what they had already stolen. The fact that you think I didn’t understand what you meant shows how self assured you are in your stupidity.
So there never was a terrorist threat to Israeli citizens?
I am now even more convinced that you don’t understand what I mean. Or just don’t want to because you’ve dug down too much and are unable to see the fact that you may have been wrong in your initial analysis of the comment.
Perhaps you should get off your high horse and think about what someone really means instead of trying to bait them like a fucking MAGAt and crying like a little bitch when that doesn’t work out for you.
Mask off moment. Never argue with a liberal, it’s a complete waste of time
Because they won’t agree with your simplistic tankie views?
Because they always argue in bad faith based on a surface level reading of headlines. It’s always the same story. I see a “tankie” citing research, statistics, historical texts on one side, and on the other I see someone like you, floundering. It’s embarrassing, and a waste of time, because you’re not in this in good faith. You never really engage with the arguments. So what’s the point?
Please show me where the tankie cited research, statistics or historical texts.
You’re embarrassing yourself here. And you’re not in good faith either. I am in absolutely the best of faiths and have not made a single bad faith argument in this entire thread. Get off your high horse. You don’t own the truth.
No there never was. There was a threat to pissrahelli settlers sure, but I don’t consider a threat to terrorists terrorism. I perfectly understood you’re commenr from the beginnig. You think the zionist entity has a right to defend it’s stolen land.
Kids at a festival? Really dude? That’s a pretty nasty take
you mean the ones that were mostly killed by the iof? I simply wouldn’t have partied next to modern day auschwitz. Complete skill isue.
Kids are fucking stupid man.
Doesn’t mean they have to die for it.
israelis arent people lol
LOL K