• Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They really need to stop devaluing the meaning of the word “racism.”

    Equating the life of individual privilege that the leader of an autocratic nation lives with an oppressed minority is despicable. Even from the (completely dishonest) position that leaders like Kim Jong Un are actively making their countries better, there’s no perspective that allows one to depict someone in such a position of power as suffering akin to the murdered and marginalized communities that genuine victims of racism have to suffer through.

    We hate Kim Jong Un because he’s a fascist, narcissistic piece of shit, warping the narrative in his own country to justify living a life of luxury while his people suffer. Race has nothing to do with it.

    • starik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The meme isn’t even playing on his ethnicity in any way. It’s mocking his weight and unearned position of power.

        • starik@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think you mean “remotely”, not inherently. And yes, it is. Are you familiar with the South Park character of Cartman?

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            No, I don’t; no, it isn’t; yes, I am.

            It could by association be mocking his weight, but that is clearly not the inherent focus of the image macro; it is comparing Dear Leader to the character with his entitled attitude exemplified in S2E4.

            • starik@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              “Inherently” is stronger than “by association”, so what’s with the “even” qualifier before “inherently”? Using “even” makes it sound like you’re going to follow it up with a word that connotes a weak tie (like “remotely”), and say it doesn’t “even” have that weak tie. It’s like saying “I didn’t even get a 100 on that exam.” Confusing use of language.

              • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Not really. I was attempting to specifically highlight the point about weight, e.g., “it’s not even that.”

                • starik@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Like valley girls’ way of using “not even”? Ok, I hadn’t considered that. I guess that works.