• rainwall@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You dont do any of that, for one, or you do it under a fake name.

    It was also probally easier 24 years than it is now. No cellphones, no social media, very basic digital cameras, almost no survelance cameras.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Cellphones existed in 2002. They weren’t smart phones, but we had mobile cellular devices. And MySpace. That was only a few years out from Twitter and Digg being released.

      You’re talking like it was 1970…

      • rainwall@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Good catch. I should have said smart phones. Cellphones were around, but think calls/basic texting, no cameras, no internet, no GPS.

        It was still somewhat common to not have a cellphone back then, so tracking people was not so ubiquitous as it is now.

        Myspace launched in 2003, so it didnt exist. Friendster technically did, as it looks like it launced in march, 2002. Id still say that no, there was no social media of note in 2002, unless you want to talk about usenet/IRC. Neither of the latter were in common use or likely to help assist you finding someone who didnt want to be found.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          My dad worked at a social media start-up in 1999, but I guess it didn’t catch on

      • raef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Friendster. MySpace came a year later. But even if we were talking about the '70s, we could still say cell phones existed