As details of the death toll for January’s protests continue to emerge, three students explain why they are resisting a return to normality

More than 45 days after a brutal January crackdown that left thousands of Iranian protesters dead, students across several universities are protesting again. As Iran’s new academic term began on Saturday, students in Tehran gathered on campus, chanting anti-government slogans, despite a heavy security presence and plainclothes officers stationed outside university gates.

The Guardian spoke to protesting students about why they were rallying despite the fact that thousands had been killed and tens of thousands arrested in the January demonstrations.

“Our classrooms are empty because the graveyards are full,” said Hossein*, 21, a student at the University of Tehran. “It’s for them – our friends, classmates and compatriots, who were gunned down in front of our eyes, that we decided to boycott the classes.”

  • Riverside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    il y a 11 heures

    By not subjecting them to criminal economics mic sanctions, which are known to murder more than half a million people yearly?

    • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      il y a 9 heures

      Why not use sanctions? What universal law is there that we cannot, under any circumstances, block economic interaction? Governments unable to block trade might be the ultimate capitalist dream but there’s no reason sane people should be forced into it.

      • Riverside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        il y a 8 heures

        What part of “US sanctions murder half a million people yearly” do you not understand or care about?

        • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          il y a 7 heures

          For starters: the absolute vagueness of it

          Say that I’m doing some genocides and you decide you don’t want to trade with me anymore because of it. If that means I run out of money and my baby starves, would you have remorse?

          (This is a simplified allegory of the situation, but I hope you care enough about the world to understand the comparison)