cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510
The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker.
A 21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.
Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing.
Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public.
Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.
The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.
But Harris didn’t say she was going to solve all the world’s problems immediately! She wanted to personally murder every single Palestinian person. Or something.
She had a funny laugh.
But realistically she had a vagina and voters aren’t super fond of that. If she’d have been a man, she’d have won. I’ll get downvoted and accused of being misogynist but it’s voters who are, especially women.
And now she’s running again and god help us if the party makes the same mistake in 2028, if we have real elections.
Yea, your take is absolutely not realistic in the slightest.
She lost because she was a genocide enabling, corporatist pig who tried to demand votes from people that she refused to represent the interests of.
Her being a woman had nothing to do with why she lost. The only people who gave a shit about that were Republicans and they were never going to flip sides to begin with regardless of how much the Democrats try to capitulate to them.
Because Trump was certainly none of those things. He totally represented working class people, immigrants, and world peace. There is obviously nothing that Trump has done past and present that would suggest otherwise.
The only difference between him and Kamala is… What again? Sorry, I’m having a hard time finding anything different between the two of them other than their genitals.
She 100% lost because she is a woman. People would rather vote for their own economic demise and livelihood rather than vote for a woman. Don’t give Americans too much credit, the majority of them can’t even fucking read.
Miss me with the false dichotomy bullshit. Just because someone was against Kalama doesn’t mean they are an advocate for Trump.
Your simple minded perspective is no excuse for your lack of understanding about politics.
Hillary won the 2016 popular vote but yeah Kamala lost because she was a woman and not because people want radical change. Its definitely the Vulva, not the fact she was promising to be Joe Biden 2.0 at a time where most Americans were feeling Biden was failing them due to how shitty their bank accounts were.
Trump marketed that he would fix the economy. He didn’t and rug pulled. Kamala did not even bother to say radical change was coming.
Congrats on missing the entire point. Is the ignorance intentional? Or are you just this bad at piecing things together?
I just told you the difference, not my fault you don’t have reading comprehension.
You said people wanted radical change. They elected Trump in 2016 so what change?
You said Americans were feeling Biden was failing them due to their bank accounts. Yet they re-elected Trump while he was president during one of the worst economic times in US history.
Trump marketed that he would fix the economy, but during his first term he tanked it and Biden brought it back up.
I’ve never accused Americans of being smart, but come on dude… We all know why people voted for Trump. It wasn’t because he was radical change or economic growth since there was already 4 years of proof he was full of shit.
America just didn’t want a woman. A fucking moose could have run against Kamala and won because Americans are pretentious idiots.