fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 天前it's just sciencemander.xyzimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1756arrow-down119
arrow-up1737arrow-down1imageit's just sciencemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 天前message-square59fedilink
minus-squarechaogomu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down4·2 天前Another factor here is that Epstein was obsessed with physics and being friends with physicists. While Epstein was always a monster. He could hide it around certain people. But from everything I’ve read, the monster always comes out. And we all know what being Epstein’s friend eventually entails.
minus-squareAzrael@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-21 天前That’s pure speculation. Your argument is what is referred to as “guilt by association”. Your argument has no basis. It wouldn’t hold up in court.
minus-squareTonava@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 小时前Also does anyone actually have info about in what context Hawking is mentioned in the files? That makes all the difference here, I’d imagine
minus-squareAzrael@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 小时前Yes. There was a scientific conference held on Epstein’s island in 2006. Hawking was one of the scientists who attended. There is no evidence that Hawking even knew what was going on regarding the sex trafficking. https://www.justice.gov/epstein
minus-squareBullerfar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-21 天前These people don’t care. I got downvoted to hell by saying the same thing. Apparently factual evidence isn’t the norm in here.
minus-squareAzrael@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 天前You’re probably right. A story is more important than facts to them.
Another factor here is that Epstein was obsessed with physics and being friends with physicists.
While Epstein was always a monster. He could hide it around certain people.
But from everything I’ve read, the monster always comes out. And we all know what being Epstein’s friend eventually entails.
That’s pure speculation. Your argument is what is referred to as “guilt by association”. Your argument has no basis. It wouldn’t hold up in court.
Also does anyone actually have info about in what context Hawking is mentioned in the files? That makes all the difference here, I’d imagine
Yes. There was a scientific conference held on Epstein’s island in 2006. Hawking was one of the scientists who attended. There is no evidence that Hawking even knew what was going on regarding the sex trafficking.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein
These people don’t care. I got downvoted to hell by saying the same thing. Apparently factual evidence isn’t the norm in here.
You’re probably right. A story is more important than facts to them.