Progressive Analilia Mejia has pulled off a long-shot win in a special election primary for New Jersey’s 11th congressional district, defeating favorite Tom Malinowski thanks to AIPAC’s intervention in the race.

Malinowski conceded Tuesday morning, saying in a post on X that Mejia “deserves unequivocal praise and credit for running a positive campaign and for inspiring so many voters on Election Day.”

“But the outcome of this race cannot be understood without also taking into account the massive flood of dark money that AIPAC spent on dishonest ads during the last three weeks,” Malinowski’s post said.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    AIPAC is reportedly about to pour tens of millions into this year’s mid-terms in the US to influence elections to preserving the current status-quo, including Democrats who have held their seats for like, the last three thousand years.

    We have to flush every incumbent and start our government over. Please get out there and register and pour out the rotten contents of this old party of worthless liches and refill with new contents. It’s just a start. We have a vast amount of work to do, and you need to be focused on your local community leadership, those are the bricks that hold up the entire stupid tower of idiocy and evil we have now.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      How silly. Why don’t they just use the Russian Election Interference Ray that consists of about 6000$ of gifs on Tik Tok?

  • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m somewhat confused by how this article is worded. If AIPAC’s negative ads against Malinowski worked and caused Meija to win instead, how exactly did that backfire?

    • ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      From the article, looks like Meija’s views on Israel are even stronger than Malinowski’s. So it’s even further against AIPIC’s interests for Meija to have won, but I assume they hasn’t considered that at the time of putting the attack ads out. But I may be wrong, the article doesn’t make it quite as clear as it maybe could.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        AIPAC did their own version of the classic “Kamala Harris won’t be perfect, so I’m going to focus all my ire on her instead of trump.”

      • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, I had to read it a few times to fully understand it. Whoever wrote the article did a piss-poor job and needs to go back to English class. My 1st grader can write better than that.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Change has to come from the primaries. This is where the battle needs to be fought, by the time it’s into an election it’s over, and you end up with Republican or Republican Light.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    …why does this article end like mid-thought? I’m not even totally clear on exactly what happened. They funded the progressive before she made her position known?

    • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The non-progressive forerunner dared to say that we might want to reconsider sending unconditional arms to Israel. In response, AIPAC released a series of negative ads against him. This split the non-progressive votes, and cleared the way for the progressive to win.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        As glad as I am to see a progressive win in the primaries, it’s sickening that a foreign influence lobby has that much sway over US internal politics, and it isn’t even a secret…

        • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I couldn’t agree more. Unfortunately, it’s even worse than most people realize. AIPAC is catching on to their drop in support and is now funneling their money to politicians through proxy PACs, such as the United Democracy Project (UDP). Also, since unrestricted arms sales to Israel is not a popular position, they didn’t bother attacking Malinowski on that issue. Instead, they put out ads on the topic of him funding ICE, since they knew that would hurt him more.

          Good news is that AIPAC has now paid for the focus group polling, and field tested the idea of attacking politicians on the topic of ICE support. This should embolden progressive candidates to attack establishment politicians on this issue.

          Here is a longish article on AIPAC and the NJ special election for more details. Also, Ryan Grimm has a great summary in the first third of this video. It looks like Breaking Points covers this election again today, but I haven’t had a chance to watch the new episode yet.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I see.

            Hopefully this win and others like Mamdani’s embolden a new push for progressive candidates, especially now when the republican base is weakening, and people are losing patience with establishment Dems.

            As long as elections aren’t obstructed by the fascists (that’s a big if), then this is actually a really good opportunity for progressive politics, if it’s seized on. Like, I can’t think of a better time to run on a progressive platform.

            Hopefully the tankies don’t succeed at convincing everyone not to vote. They’re as dangerous as maga to the progressive cause.

            • freedom@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Be careful with Mamdani. He’s placed a few Israeli supporters in positions. I want to believe he won organically, but you never know. Maybe they were placed there due to political games he was forced to play, but still double take territory.

        • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’m sorry, but I don’t understand this post (and that’s not my downvote).

          Edit: I like your joke and I’m happy I could help. To be fair, I already heard about this AIPAC blunder, so I didn’t need to rely on how this specific article was written.

          • MehBlah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            You didn’t answer his first question. The primary question he asked

            So he ended his response early like he states the article did.

            • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Them:

              why does this article end like mid-thought?

              You:

              You didn’t answer his first question. The primary question he asked

              Surely you can’t be serious. Nobody is going to be able able to jump into the author’s brain like that, and it is obviously not a serious “primary” question.

              • MehBlah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                That is right. When you don’t know you don’t say. You should have just not answered at all.

                • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Please re-read the exchange. I clearly and concisly answered the primary question, which is about what happened in regard to AIPAC funding in the election.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    A PROGRESSIVE Won? So the way to WIN Elections is to be Progressive? Let’s give ICE MORE Money!

    -Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries!

    • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mockery like this will not go unpunished. Expect a strongly worded letter condemning this comment.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    one of the few modern bright spots is when filling out a ballot its much easier to look at a canidates voting record and sources of money.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Full support of the dnc too:

    “Analilia Mejia ran a powerful grassroots campaign laser focused on ensuring our economy works for families, not billionaires. From skyrocketing utility and grocery costs to Trump holding the Gateway Tunnel project hostage, New Jersey families are paying the price for Trump and New Jersey Republicans’ toxic agenda. New Jersey deserves a fighter and not a spineless Trump lackey. From now until Election Day, the DNC is all-in to ensure Analilia Mejia clinches victory.”

    https://democrats.org/news/dnc-congratulates-analilia-mejia-on-her-victory-in-last-weeks-democratic-primary/

  • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sick.

    Real quick though, FUCK ELIZABETH WARREN. Who gives a fuck what that slimeball endorses. We could have had Bernie and now we have the fourth Reich because of this piece of shit and Democrats like her.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Weird. I thought there was a huge vote before the Chee-to got in, where people could have chosen something so much better already but …didn’t. That must be Warren’s fault personally as well.

      • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do you or they have the power of being one of the first states to endorse a candidate or the power to convince other senators to endorse a candidate instead of the most popular choice?

    • thlibos@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair, the cynic in me says Sanders never would have become president. Even if the DNC had let primaries take their natural course and Sanders had come out of it with the most electoral votes, then the DNC would have just brokered their convention and given it to Biden or Bloomberg anyway. If they somehow didn’t do that and Bernie was the actual candidate from the D side, the mainstream media coverage of him would have all sounded like Fox News or Newsmax fluffing Trump. All his major media coverage would have been Marxist chicken-littling. If, even after all that, Bernie somehow won in November of 2020, he never would have made it to the inauguration. He (and his VP candidate) would have had a little accident, a la Jeffrey Epstein, Paul Wellstone, Vince Foster, Terrance Yeakey, etc.

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’ve said similar about Hillary winning in 2016. Republicans were already drawing up articles of impeachment. trump or no trump, the country had already fallen into a shithole sewer and was barely keeping it’s head above water. Still would have been nice to see Sanders get the nod. Just for some glimmer of hope.