Starting in early March, the platform will place every account into a default “teen-appropriate” experience unless it has proof that users are adults.

The move has brought widespread criticism from Discord users, who are citing privacy and security concerns following a recent breach of a third-party vendor that ended up exposing around 70,000 government ID images used to verify the age of Discord users.

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is the part, young-but-becoming-wise friends, where the company doesn’t give a shit about you and starts to prey on children, who, for a while, become very lucrative.

    The chances of discord pushing ahead anyway, even with this very public outcry, is still 50/50.

    • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I figure losing half their users while making money on their new surveillance scheme might be more profitable. Than have 100% of their user continue to use the app as is.

  • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I tried to get into it but with it being presented as IRC but “fun” on their website, I couldn’t really understand why so many nearly empty projects sites keep telling me to try their server for more (or any, really) information… Then I did try to accept an invite, but why the fuck to I need to create an account to know if I want to create an account to begin with? So now, anything promoting Discord as the main method of getting information simply set off my scam alert.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      you need to create an account for everything so that complaint rings hollow. Discord doesnt even have a high barrier as an account can be created in a few seconds and you can use it in the web.

      • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I didn’t have to in order to figure out if Lemmy was something I wanted to use. Neither for IRC. That makes Discord vastly inferior to both.

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sadly I think the end result of this won’t be people leaving discord, but people giving up liberties because it’s easier than fighting it

    And they’re banking on that, it’s part of why they intentionally gave zero warning…1 month is nothing.

    With more time a dedicated set of people could pull the alternatives up into solid real options

    Or kick up such a huge ruckus that discord back down and undo it.

    This was a very intentional and malicious choice to go “oh, yeah we’re doing this next month, kthnxbye”

    • jpablo68@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I agree, convenience wins in this case, this is why twitter is still “bulletproof”.

    • canthangmightstain@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Anyone with sense saw this coming when they did the same thing in Australia and the UK but I otherwise agree with your point. I think this is a very calculated move.

      When the deadline gets here in a month, 80% of the group that would’ve migrated out of disgust won’t be affected because they just use Discord for group voice chats anyway, and the competition isn’t ready. The rest have been trained to put their personal info out there to anyone who asks for it. And, when (not if) they eventually roll out “IDs for Everyone”, the outrage won’t be nearly as detrimental to their bottom line because it’s already happened before.

  • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The obvious solution here is for DEVICE manufacturers to add verification steps in the OS for parents to configure.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Obvious

      How is this not worse?

      Rather than a hypothetical advertising ID assigned at the browser. We now have a physical government ID tied to every single device Serial ID accessible by anyone who claims they need age verification (read: everyone).

      • Xylian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        What he wants are just OS level parental controls. If enabled the OS tells apps that the user is underage. Like the only info is:

        underage: true/false

        • Rooster326@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Don’t we already have this?

          Google Family Link, Apple Screen Time

          I have personally set it up. Works great for Google and Apple. The Amazon equivalent is shite - literally had to generate e-waste to get better control.

      • Justifier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hey I have a better idea

        How about they fuck off and talk to internet router hardware companies to make decent software UIs, with defaults that make sheep masses actually use them to ‘protect the children’ client side where it actually works

        Oh because its not actually about that and the powers that be don’t actually give a rats about protecting children and this whole protect the children conversation is a red herring to allow them to push their real goals which include but are not limited to mass censorship of people who disagree with and resist their opinions, actions, and agendas

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The real trick is we need the governments to back down and just make sure we have the power to allow/deny our kids access.

      • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean uploading your government ID or having to share your biometric data via video is also just as terrible. There is no guarantee that these companies will not fuck it up sell your data get hacked etc. Instead of an ID number linked to you and they now have a copy of your identity.

        • Rooster326@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Right and attaching it to your phone just means you click. “Send Daved Video” instead of “Record”.

          They are still going to have it for their own records

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ok, honestly with some caveats, this might have legs.

      What most of us want: to use our services anonymously and privately

      What some of us want: to keep youtube/discord/roblox from enabling pedofarms. yes i get the obligatory people should just raise their kids

      What companies say they want: to keep kids safe

      What companies really want: to appease some users and farm as much data about someone as they can and to comply with the growing trend of places that require age verification.

      So, what if they provide an offline model for age verification? download the model, phone in airplane mode. verify yourself, get a digitally signed certificate, expunge the app so shove that verifiable signature as proof that you’re an adult.

      From the corporate standpoint, It’s no different than signing into their account and giving them your face. we keep our privacy, they can fuck off about it.

  • Cantaloupe877@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I could just be me being a doomer, but I doubt any significant exodus will happen. People really about to drop discord? Right…

    • gen/Eric Computers@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      There’s no way in hell I’d upload my ID. Especially since discord recently had a data breach.

      Though, threatening to delete (and maybe actually doing so) might make them reconsider.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah I think these articles are trying to push people to leave discord and not actually reporting a real trend. Even on lemmy where people are far more likely to be halfway out the door or wanting to leave discord its still a low amount saying they left.

      Across the 20 servers im in i’ve seen 0 movement. People arent even talking about it.

    • fishy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mentioned dropping discord in my gaming group chat. Five non political normies and myself. Literally nobody is fighting to stay on discord. We’ll try a few alternatives and even if I’ve gotta fork over a few bucks a month, I will. Any site that requires id is dead to me.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s like when people say that this time we won’t pre-order games anymore, and the new call of duty is the steam bestseller a month before release.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m with you.

      Considering that age verification will only be mandatory to browse NSFW content, and that without it you can still join servers and keep calling during gameplay as per usual, my bet is that exodus won’t happen. There is going to be part of people who will verify, and the unverified half either gonna leave or keep using discord just without NSFW.

      Reddit exodus, unfortunately, barely had any impact. Bluesky had a good influx of new users, but it didnt kill xitter. Doubt that there anything going to happen with discord.

    • sandbag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Root? What’s that from what I’ve heard a lot of people are moving to stoat.

      • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Intro to Root that I watched

        Root app’s website

        I made a Root account and run it on NixOS through their appimage. I’m waiting on my friend to get it so I can test the voicechat and screen share but so far it’s functional and has 2 awesome features that Discord doesn’t have. Reply to more than 1 comment with only 1 of your messages. Tabs on the top similar to a browser, it’s just more natural for me than the sidebar shit.

        In the mean time I’m still probably gonna host a Matrix server with a VPS incase Root ever decides to pull a Discord.

        Plus I just don’t like the name “Stoat.” xD “Get on Stoat bro” Sounds weird.

          • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            For now they’re really incentivized to not be douchebags to grow their company, at least for the a year or two imo. Which is plenty of time for people like us to figure out how to host our own shit so we don’t have to decide whether we want convenience or privacy/security.

            But I’m still hopeful for Root just like I’m hopeful for a company like Steam continues to stay decent.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Plus I just don’t like the name “Stoat.” xD “Get on Stoat bro” Sounds weird.

          This is actually the main reason I believe most of these discord alternatives have zero chance at becoming mainstream. Name is 75% of the success. Just think about it.

  • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Maybe people will finally realize discord isn’t the place for your projects documentation to exist

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Wait, what are people using it for? I use discord for shooting the shit with people about video games and politics.

      • Camille@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ve seen so many IT projects, associations, communities of minorities using discord in lieu of wikis, forums, documentation, etc. I personally know a marginalized community with a dire need of visibility, information and stuff that has everything locked behind their discord server and everything is about to be lost. It’s both extremely sad and a huge “told you so years ago”

      • Cryxtalix@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s fine. Unfortunately people are using it to coordinate open source software development. I don’t know how people do it. You have to use the search box and scroll through hundreds of chat messages to find some code you need. It doesn’t show up on google. It’s just horrible.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Pretty much anything 3d printing-related has a discord. Want to build a specific type of printer? Latest info is always on the discord, and if you don’t check it you’ll find yourself with pieces that don’t fit together.

  • Sheldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I am just not going to participate in that verification shit, and, for now, I will just not see that stuff anymore.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I agree. I hope Discord both fails as a company and as a concept.

      Information siloed inside a non-easily searchable interface? No thank you.

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Already looking into alternatives. My friends and I are going to switch asap. They aren’t that tech savvy, so it’s pretty much up to me to find a good alternative and teach them how to use it. I don’t mind tho lol

  • bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    248
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Discord age restrictions prevent an underage user from viewing - but not sending - nude pictures.

    This isn’t to protect kids. It’s to enforce increasingly authoritarian control over the web.

    • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      Any source for this ?

      The official announcement is quite vague and since the feature isn’t out it’s hard to know how it will work exactly.

      Also, I assume the biggest risk isn’t for teens to send nudes “unprompted” but to let adults contact them and ask for them.

      This for example is very vague :

      Age-gated Spaces – Only users who are age-assured as adults will be able to access age-restricted channels, servers, and app commands.

      So if a teen can only interact with other teens on dedicated spaces it should make it harder for perverts to ask for stuff.

      And if an adult tries to pretend to be a teen he will only see blurred content ?

      I’m sure many will think I’m trying to defend Discord on this but I’m not. Again we dont really know how this update will work. I’m just trying to make sure we dont spread misinformation.

      There will be plenty of time to criticize Discord when they push this update.

      What I’m sure of is that discord was definitely a platform of choice for many bad people to hunt and groom teens.

      Personally, it’s the fact that discord says they will delete my verification data :

      Identity documents submitted to our vendor partners are deleted quickly— in most cases, immediately after age confirmation.

      In most cases ? Really ? Is that supposed to look trustworthy ?

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The age restrictions for Discord were implemented already in my country a few months ago, that’s why I know it works that way

        For what it’s worth, I’m a survivor of childhood sexual abuse and online grooming, and IMO this policy does not make vulnerable kids any safer at all. As a kid, growing up, I was desperate for any validation and even kindness because of my neglectful/abusive home situation and that need was exploited by adults who provided me the emotional connection I needed/wanted, which was then twisted into a romantic/sexual relationship. That’s the risk, and all it needs is a basic chat functionality - once it has started, the groomer can very easily “help” the young person bypass any and all “protections” through any number of methods, including just switching to another platform.

        The reality is that most kids are far more at danger from abusive adults in their lives - their parents, family, friends, teachers, etc. - than they are at danger from the Internet. The reason I was vulnerable to abuse online is because I was already abused IRL. If you (or anyone) has concerns about their kids safety online, by far the best thing you can do is just to be there for them, be a trustworthy, kind and loving adult in their lives. That way, when creeps online talk to them, they won’t be needy for the attention, they won’t be vulnerable, and if something makes them uncomfortable, they’ll come and talk to you about it.

        Anyways, went off on kind of a tangent, but I hope it’s helpful/informative anyways.

      • eleijeep@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So if a teen can only interact with other teens on dedicated spaces it should make it harder for perverts to ask for stuff.

        There is no age verification to prove you’re a teen. The age verification is to prove that you’re an adult.

        • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          1 day ago

          Please read the end of my message.

          If you are a teen “by default” you will have all the restrictions of a teen until you prove you are an adult.

          So an adult with ill intentions should either be :

          • A teen by default and therefore have many limitations.
          • An adult that have limitations in reaching to teens.

          Again it’s what the very vague statement of Discord says. We also have no clue how their “inference model for age classification” works either…

          • cmhe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            1 day ago

            So an adult could just create two accounts, one to access teen spaces, where they don’t verify their age l and one for accessing adult spaces, where the age gets verified?

            • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Please read the Discord official post.

              one to access teen spaces,

              That account will be tagged as a teen account until proven otherwise. Therefore any message or DM he will receive will go to a special inbox with most likely warnings to consult it.

              Please, again, I understand that the pitchforks are out for discord, I’m just asking you to take the time to read the official discord post from top to bottom.

              There will still be unknowns until they release the update but your question is already answered by their official post.

              Basically, as long as an account hasn’t done an age verification it’s assumed to be a teen. And that means all the limitations attached to that. So you can create 10 accounts if you want either :

              • You have proven you are an adult on that account you remove the limitations to what you can do but your messages towards teen accounts will most likely go to that special inbox they mention. No clue exactly how hidden and how much warning are attached to that inbox.

              • You have no proven your age and your account is limited like any other teens account. You won’t be able to see “sensitive media” whatever Discord means by that I dont know.

              What I really wonder is what they will allow in term of interactions between the two groups in details. They are very vague on many aspects of it.

              But multiplying your accounts on discord doesn’t look like a valid workaround to their system.

              • cmhe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                The point I am making is about protecting teens from adults. So teen-per-default means that adults can freely talk to teens, which should be prevented. Either allow no teens on your platform, or teens have to proof that they are teens first.

                Adults (and teens for that matter) are pretty good at obfuscating grooming.

                • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  So teen-per-default means that adults can freely talk to teens, which should be prevented.

                  That’s not my understanding.

                  I get your point but by default if Discord thinks you are a teen it also implies all the limitations associated with that status. Which means some media will be blurred and some commands cannot be done.

                  An adult can keep his “teen default status” but he also keeps all the limitations associated with it. Which I suppose doesn’t mean they can “freely” talk to other accounts as you state.

                  Notably the DM that a groomer would send will end up in a special inbox for all teens or for that matter “default teen”.