return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 4 days agoLawmakers suggest at least a half-dozen men are being protected by over-redactions in Epstein filesedition.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1344arrow-down11
arrow-up1343arrow-down1external-linkLawmakers suggest at least a half-dozen men are being protected by over-redactions in Epstein filesedition.cnn.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squarecrapwittyname@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 days agoAm I being dense to assume that one of the six names is “Donald J Trump”? Why would he not be one of the names?
minus-squarephutatorius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoTrump’s name appears at least 1 million times in the “unredacted” (less redacted) files.
minus-squareZephyrXero@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoIt was 6 new names, Trump was already well documented before
minus-squarefizzle@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoThe 6 names apparently had no obvious reason to be redacted. Trump’s reasons for redaction are obvious.
Am I being dense to assume that one of the six names is “Donald J Trump”? Why would he not be one of the names?
Trump’s name appears at least 1 million times in the “unredacted” (less redacted) files.
It was 6 new names, Trump was already well documented before
The 6 names apparently had no obvious reason to be redacted. Trump’s reasons for redaction are obvious.