It seems like a weird point to bring up. How often do y’all convert your measurements? It’s not even a daily thing. If I’m measuring something, I either do it in inches, or feet, rarely yards. I’ve never once had to convert feet into miles, and I can’t imagine I’m unique in this. When I have needed to, it’s usually converting down (I.e. 1/3 of a foot), which imperial does handle better in more cases.

Like. I don’t care if we switch, I do mostly use metric personally, it just seems like a weird point to be the most common pro-metric argument when it’s also the one I’m least convinced by due to how metric is based off of base 10 numbering, which has so many problems with it.

Edit: After reading/responding a lot in the comments, it does seem like there’s a fundamental difference in how distance is viewed in metric/imperial countries. I can’t quite put my finger on how, but it seems the difference is bigger than 1 mile = 1.6km

  • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lolOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    For evidence of the mile scale vs foot scale bit:

    We have 2 measurements between that we don’t really use anymore. Chains, and furlongs most notably (8 furlongs to a mile, 10 chains to a furlong, 100 links to a chain, 4 inches to a link). The middle distance is just yards now. 50 yards, etc.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Actually, because a chain is 66’, a link is 0.66’ or 7.92".

      A furlong is then 660’, so 220 yards, which is 201.17m.

      A mile, being 8 furlongs is then roughly 1.6km

      • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lolOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ahh, right, mixed up the measurement between hand and link. I was tired, and neither units get thought of much xD I also keep forgetting it’s one of the only units that isn’t a flat number.