• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I live in Russia nearly all my life, and I can tell it really is a matter of proper maintancnce. Many cities do a very poor job keeping these buildings in a good shape, but when they do, it looks fairly good. Look through the comment section for examples, they are real, I’ve seen quite a few.

    Not to mention European neighbors where they are still common, but due maintenance makes them look actually good.

    The sound issues are fair, but there are ways to limit them.

    • SealofLove@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      is a matter of proper maintenance to an extend. You can paint a box, it’ll still be a box, just not as grey. And let’s not pretend Russia maintains anything. In Moscow maybe, but most of the country looks just as depressing as shown on the picture in OP. Our government never has money for fixing old infrastructure, only for war. My point is, panel houses don’t have to look so ugly anymore. But people here are arguing like it’s the only alternative to homelessness. Live in ugly, cramped panel houses or nowhere at all.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think the point is about present.

        More like, “back when these things were built, government had to build the most resource-efficient and mass-constructed housing, responding to a surge in demand for urban living due to industrialization”

        It was either this or leaving people without any place to live.

        Sure, modern situation is different, and we can have nicer homes.