• Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    What you just said, is that stopping the treatment early is detrimental to the human race. Did you perhaps mean the opposite?

    No, I didn’t. Understanding why that is the case is the key to understanding this post.

    You specifically said that it was threatening self-harm. That is not true.

    You are now trying to move the goalposts. I will accept that as you understanding that what you said was not correct.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you are promoting antibiotic resistant bacteria in your body, is that not self harm? I sure think it is.

      Not all self harm is cutting, starving, or suicide.

      • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The reason why a pharmacists would care is more the fact that once the resistant bacteria gets out of your body and into the world it reduces the effectiveness of antibiotics for every human.

        The push to get people to finish their courses of antibiotics is done to keep antibiotics effective for everyone.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah. So we agree that she’s threatening self harm (minimum) to solicit a response from someone. Emotional manipulation.

          I’m glad we managed to argue our way to what we already concluded from the start.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              As far as I’m concerned, “threatening” to use your own body in an attempt to raise antibiotic resistant bacteria, is self harm.

              You don’t have to agree. That’s fine.

              • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Ok and as far I’m concerned it’s not. You don’t have to agree, that’s fine.

                You get that this is a joke posted on science memes right? This isn’t a real situation.