• Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t even get the point to the flashy BIOS interface, the thing isn’t something you should be spending much of any time in. You get in, make the change you intend to make, burn a sacrifice as an offering to the gods, and hope that it works out right.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      I find the new interfaces to be less user friendly. I’m not a child: I don’t want my BIOS to look like a fucking sports car. My bed, sure, but not BIOS.

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      in ‘gaming’ laptops people go into firmware settings to see what change increases performance of a game too often. when doing in social environment, I’ve seen people to show off their laptop by how cool the ‘inbuilt’ os looks (much like people do for their desktop environment).

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I honestly don’t mind flashy and data-forward in a bios, but for fucks sake, can we get consistency?

    I shouldn’t need to click a random button to go into advanced to find a half assed tree that doesn’t collapse cleanly. And can we just get a fucking save button, and if you press exit without saving it goes, hey boss, you wanna save?

    It can be both visually appealing and rich in data without being overly complicated.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      But it did teach me to fear and HATE software that doesn’t work with a keyboard.

      The fuck do you mean if I tab on this sidebar menu I end up on the close button on the other side of the UI???

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      learning to navigate modern uis has taught me to fear software that works only with a mouse. why? Because simply it is dreadful, any modern ui has long forgotten shortcuts and traditions that I take for granted, by doing so they make themselves horrible to navigate

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was annoyed by this the other day. Just swapped motherboards in a server machine in my house and I had to find a mouse to quickly navigate the bios.

    I could have done it with the keyboard, sure, but I weighed the amount of time to fumble vs the time to dig through a drawer.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had a boot disk that would run DR-DOS in a RAM disk because that was somehow lighter than MS-DOS’ RAM footprint so that I could free up the 1MB or so to run Doom

  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I have a 486 with a mouse driven BIOS…

    Edit: Here is a screenshot I found online that looks like the one I have (note the 1994 copyright at the top):

    Mouse driven BIOS GUI from a mid 90s PC.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The BIOS on some old Thinkpads has a bird flapping its wings as a mouse cursor.

      My 560X from 1998 has one of those BIOSes, too.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        lol, in this case ‘update’ would require physically replacing the ROM chip on the motherboard. Sometimes they were nice enough to make it a socketed chip.

        • Gork@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          At least the attack surface is super small right now. Probably not many viruses out in the wild targeting 486s.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 days ago

    I prefer that ancient American megatrends style. I find that mouse based EFI guis are always really laggy and frustrating to use with the mouse, so I end up using the keyboard anyway. Plus, I’m just here to change boot order or some random OC setting, I don’t need animations and nice graphic design. Newer bios menus just feel like a bunch of form over function when form is irrelevant.

  • nemith@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    To be honest back in 1990 having a tui with arrow key navigation in a start up rom was pretty fucking advanced.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    The early 2010s was peak BIOS design. When I built a new PC in 2022 to replace my 2014 4th gen i5 machine, I was amazed to discover that the BIOS interface in my brand new, $500 AM5 motherboard was actually worse than the one in my old $120 board.

    The old one ran at my display’s native resolution (1080p at the time), had a contemporary interface, and cool stats showing on the left and right sides of the screen. Meanwhile the BIOS in my modern PC runs at 1024x768, is mostly text-based, and so many settings are just buried several menus deep. IDK if this is an AMD problem or an AM5 problem (not a motherboard manufacturer problem cause they’re both Gigabyte boards), but it was a shock to the system for sure to see how badly the tech has regressed.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      BIOS and UEFI are collaborations between the mobo manufacturer and the CPU manufacturer. The CPU side of it includes things like microcode and code for moving the settings values into the registers (or other location) where they are actually used. The mobo side would be the UI itself and setting up the menus, as well as adding stuff for the other hardware components that need something set up at boot time.

      Fwiw, the gigabyte AM5 mobo I use has a responsive UI in the UEFI program, and displays at a decent resolution (though probably not the native one, 1080p would be my guess). Though the mouse might be more usable because it has hardware DPI selection.

    • underscores@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      BIOS menus have always been shitty in my experience in Intel and AMD, with my AMD motherboard I can only use the keyboard because the mouse input is incredibly slow and unusable, not sure how it passed QA.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just switched to an AM5 board and at least on mine there’s a setting that enables HD resolutions, but the input works noticeably worse than on my mobo from 10 years ago.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Might be an AM5 thing or that particular board, I don’t recall these particular shortcomings in my Gigabyte 12th gen Intel mobo or my friend’s Asus AM4 mobo

  • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Gosh, I hate those new GUI UEFI BIOS interfaces so much.

    The problem with the new ones they usually DON’T HAVE the option to change back to normal TUI-like layout.

    E: one more paragraph

    • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      The new ones don’t always work with the keyboard well.

      What’s the point of a software that doesn’t work well with keyboard?

      (Excluding art software like GIMP/Krita.)

  • Resplendent606@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Honestly, if your UEFI/BIOS has mouse support it is too much. My MSI board (which I really dislike) wants you to use your mouse and it is so annoying.

  • Farid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Umm, I’m sorry to be the one to tell you, guys, but my PC has that exact BIOS screen and it’s 10 years old. They aren’t that “new”.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I had a Ryzen mobo that actually removed most of the window dressings after a bios update, because there wasn’t enough room to fit all the new cpu model names/descriptions.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        that’s nice really. one of my old ones you had to chose between a or b version that had differing cpu support