LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 days agoI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square643fedilinkarrow-up1809arrow-down179
arrow-up1730arrow-down1imageI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square643fedilink
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days ago Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren’t. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn’t any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I’m not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn’t provide a shred of evidence to support your argument
Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs.
Yep
you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄
No they aren’t.
There isn’t any ambiguity in them 🙄
Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that.
And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄
No I’m not.
Again, you still couldn’t provide a shred of evidence to support your argument
Ok.