Source https://sh.itjust.works/comment/21042568
Modlog https://p.programming.dev/modlog?user=143877
Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance!
And consider donating to individual instances instead.
Check the megathread for more!
If you don’t care, demanding other people educate you in super disrespectful.
i’ve said what i had and wanted to say, and why i feel the way i do, it’s your decision on what to think of it, but putting all i wrote into a phrase “not caring” is a very crude oversimplification.
You ask of me to stop acting lazy, yet you’re reluctant to merely read my comment yourself. I hope my writing skills aren’t actually that bad.
You said
So if I say uncaring it’s just true, not a simplification. It undercuts the rest of what you were saying.
and i’ve literally dedicated a paragraph on why i think that “spoon-feeding” must be, if a person is caring enough to ask, but not caring enough to research. I don’t care what you thik of me, but i really think the world would be a better place, if more people acted the way i proposed in that exact paragraph.
I honestly expected your judgement to be more rational and less emotional, especially considering how fast you swayed towards the edge of the latter, how valuable it is to pereive history in it’s original context, and how it’s practically impossible to be convincing while acting like you do. In other words, i’m bitterly disappointed in you, random person in my phone, i thought you were a heart of gold, but now you seem more like a guilt-tripped pretender.
it literally does not, and that’s exactly why i wrote as many effing words as i did, because i know that people are scared of such long blankets of texts, so i avoid writing them whenever possible.
And at this point i subconciously start to doubt your earlier theseses, simply because if i can’t trust your reding comprehention in a casual conversation, i can’t trust your reading comprehention in regards to scientific historical publications either, even though i know it’s a biased and probably unjustified way of thought. Well done.
Hmm
Disagreeing with you doesn’t mean I don’t understand you.
You were the one demanding other people educate you. If you won’t take it my criticisms still stand.
Bye.
disagreement is not what i’m angry about, you haven’t even read what i said, stopping at the first paragraph and acted all mighty and righteous, refusing to comprehend what’s written further, stopping any semblance of discusrion then and there.