Excuse me while I go donate even more money to PieFed

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    That makes sense on a closed forum like Facebook or Instagram where its your own page and you can block people from seeing it, but I don’t know if you should be allowed to post misinformation or spam or snake oil on a public forum and then prevent that public from seeing anything in the comments that might contradict you. The room for abuse outweighs the potential benefits in my view.

    • cm0002@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      post misinformation or spam or snake oil on a public forum and then prevent that public from seeing anything in the comments that might contradict you

      That’s what instance admins and comm mods are for

      Anything less than full blocking leaves a much bigger room for harassment.

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        If a bad faith user has blocked people who might be critical of their misinformation or poor behaviour, there’d be no-one to alert the moderators.

        Someone tested the consequences of this type of blocking on Reddit.

        • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Piefed blocking should prevent the blocked person from replying to the blocker.

          I tried it a while ago, it was functional on the same instance, I don’t remember between Piefed instance or between Piefed and Lemmy