The article is quite good, I just disagree with this sentence :
Proof of this came just a few days after the NFP’s victory, when she co-signed an op-ed calling on the left to compromise with Macron so that a centrist majority could emerge — in other words, to betray left-wing voters
That wasn’t at all the idea of this op-ed. It was a call for concessions in order to govern, not to create a majority with macronists. For some, any concession is a compromission…
mutt, because it looks like it’s from the last 20 years. Of the 20th century.
I don’t know why we’re debating when I have the impression that we agree and are saying the same thing?
Yes, I did, because you know, America is not the whole world. I was speaking about school chaplaincy in general.
Secular France has this kind of chaplains
It’s probably an unpopular opinion, but if public school chaplain positions are open to everyone, if they provide spiritual counsel to students who want it, without proselytizing or coercing students into religious activities, and if their work is controlled by the school to stay sure they don’t contradict scientific teachings and respect the psychological development and freedom of children, they can be a good thing. Secular France has this kind of chaplains, and it’s great; somehow I don’t believe it’s possible today in Florida.
If I understand the original idiom, the nearest French expression would be “you can’t make a race horse from a donkey” (“tu ne peux pas faire un cheval de course d’un âne”).
Thanks.
I always thought that mini computer.were more power hungry than SBC. Am I wrong?
“No God before me” can have, and does have in the history of Christianity, three possible interpretations.
Of course this is just a model, all positions are deeper than that and most people mix two or even the three models. I don’t know where the Orthodox Churches stand.
For myself, I tend to be somewhere between the second and the third model.
I will find you.