oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything
oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything
“they” uses the same number of characters as “s/he” and flows more naturally
it’s had offline navigation for years now
google maps can do that too though
try a factor of 100
no it’s not, it’s for the entire device
I was referring to the fair in your hypothetical smartass
as if random civilians with guns wouldn’t bumble around more and also shoot the crowd?
metal detectors? pretty easy since it’s a ticketed event
that doesn’t necessarily mean it is possible though. just to be clear
how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
not saying you’re wrong, but that is a whataboutism
I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist
arguably billionaires and corporations are still people-powered
edit: as in the wealth of billionaires and corporations only exists due to the exploration of the labor of the people. without that labor, billionaires wouldn’t exist
no true scotsman fallacy
why not?
👍