That’s what I’m saying.

The argument:

If you never pay for music, artists won’t be able to make new music

is fundamentally flawed. Nearly all artists don’t make more than pocket change at best.

Even if we were to abolish all copyright tomorrow and no one would every pay for art again, art would still exist and be published. Because as it turns out, people enjoy making art.

That’s not to say they shouldn’t be paid. Of course people should make a living by selling art. But OP saying art will cease to exist if there is no money is completely wrong.

Open https://bandcamp.com/discover?s=rand and check how many albums have sold more than 5 copies.

How are those artists able to make music without making money? Because according to you, they can’t.

The face is bigger than normal size I think. The proportions of the face itself seem mostly fine, yet the eyes are far too high up his head.

I almost certainly don’t have ADHD but occasionally do the center one (unintentionally, due to procrastination). But I’m pretty sure that everyone who does that does not get 40 hours of equivalent “quality” work done, more like 40 hours of somewhat careless work that is acceptable at best.

I know this because I have just spent 10 days preparing for an exam for a university lecture I have visited twice in this semester before ignoring it completely.

The E in EBC is basically as relevant as the E in European Article Number (EAN) which are used globally.

Fun fact: Many countries use both systems actually.

For speaking, it’s quicker to say something like: “The party starts at 8” instead of “The party starts at 20 o’clock”.

For writing though, you would never use the 12 hour system.

Clearly the hammer and sickle are above the luxury brand, therefore this symbolizes how the proletariat is in control of the means of production or something.

I suspect Tunisia is one of those countries that desperately tries to appear tough to their population. It’s a national embarrassment to have a foreign nation attack vessels in your water without you noticing.

That doesn’t prevent someone ordering “everything” at max quantity, which is almost certainly a “malicious” order.

The idea of anomaly detection is to project some input onto a (high dimensional), numeric output. From the training data alone, you can then see where the projections are clustered and develop a high dimensional “boundary” where everything within is known and good and everything outside is unknown and possibly bad. Since orders come in relatively slow, a human would be able to check for false positives and overwrite the computer decision.

By the way, an ideal training set is preprocessed and has duplicates removed and new orders added by recombining parts of individual orders.

For example, if we have 3 orders:

• (Hamburger, Fries)
• (Hamburger, Fries)
• (Cheeseburger, Sandwich)

We could then create the following set:

• (Hamburger)
• (Cheeseburger)
• (Fries)
• (Sandwich)
• (Hamburger, Fries)
• (Hamburger, Cheeseburger)
• (Hamburger, Sandwich)

And so on, and so forth. A naive variant is just taking the power set of all valid orders.

As long as the rate of cyanide is low enough, you can do it no problem.

There are machine learning algorithms for anomaly detection though. They actually work decently well because exploits like this do in fact differ significantly from regular orders. Because they assume all anomalies are attempted exploits, their false negative rate is rather low while their false positive rate can be a bit higher.

Taco Bell has the capability to create a decently large training set from all recorded orders (which must all be valid and non-malicious) so they shouldn’t have too many issues developing this model.

If an anomaly is detected, make a human verify it is indeed an irregular order.

If only you sharted in your pants instead; then you would’ve been able to partially accomodate OP’s request.

Why the fuck can normal stores sell medication in the US? That should be reserved to pharmacies with - you know - actually qualified pharmacists on site that can actually tell someone not to take 20 ibuprofen a day from that 1000 pill bottle.

It definitely cannot go to the EU. I don’t believe any EU country permits private online libraries.

Plus the entire Wayback Machine would be considered systematic copyright infringement since the Internet Archive doesn’t obtain permission prior to archival. And if you don’t have permission then it is automatic copyright infeingement.

Maybe you’re thinking of the shipping cost to return the product? That isn’t covered.

Also the sellers are only obligated to return the cost of the cheapest delivery option they provided.

Yes

Gobrick’s and Cobi’s pieces literally match LEGO’s durability and consistency and surpass it in terms of color consistency and prints by a long shot.

Xingbao was worse in the past and nowadays seems to be approaching LEGO durability but has surpassed it in terms of color consistency and prints as well.

There are a ton of other manufacturers but I don’t know enough about them. Still, they have all massively invested into plastic molding machines in recent years due to their customer base skyrocketing.

Meanwhile, LEGO produces ever worse sets at ever worse prices. 10 ct/piece are the norm even for unlicensed sets while other brands’ - like Bluebrixx - licensed sets are usually around 5 ct/piece btw.

I have completely given up on LEGO. On occasion they produce something that’s worth it at 40% off but that’s sadly the exception.

I mean the solution would be to literally just label both sides.

The pizza delivery person will invite themselves in and you will eat the pizza together.