![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
I was about to go hold up, but neutrons … And then you covered it.
I was about to go hold up, but neutrons … And then you covered it.
Angry up vote
This is more of a priest behavior.
I don’t agree with the can example. Those are physically smaller and lack meaningful slack fill.
Your points stand for the first purchase. After that people will know the proportion of chip to air, and be annoyed by it. If they could do a bag smaller with minimal chip breakage and less air they would both succeed at getting more bags out per pallet and be lauded for not cheating people by selling air.
The slack fill is functional, and I don’t see much incentive to over do it.
And the DOJ is announcing criminal charges against individuals implicated in such decisions and abuses, right???
/S
What is the company’s incentive to make the package bigger than it needs to be?
Shipping costs come two fold… Weight and number of pallets. Weight change is negligible here, but the amount of air they need to ship will increase. They are incentivized to reduce it to a minimum to save on shelf, storage, and distribution costs.
But in the morning? He’s making waffles.
What’s stopping from vetoing any bill and making it say what you want?
Absolutely no carts n in opeaisles while-galloping
Abortion is legal
(Fucked up a few letters but point remains)
Makes his transmission moen
I really enjoyed sitting out on Suomenlinna drinking long drink while chilling on the rocks.
Utter contentment and peace.
Kineseo Tape
Except we keep electing dick heads who literally don’t want to take his money.
I think it’s great when people create a small business and are successful. But I roll my eyes when they have a business with 20 employees and put their title as President & CEO on shit like linkedin. Just put owner. Or managing partner.
One of the issues is if material costs to maintain the property increase steeper than this cap.
Though the solution is pretty practical – cap it at inflation.
But they’re often the only thing available to correct an injustice. Should civil rights pioneers not have been pardoned?
maybe her physical strength is the direct product of being born into wealth and having the time to get ripped?
Sentence him to two months to be served from November 15 to January 15.
Allowing a felon to run is a legitimate check and balance that the people can have against the government.
It allows for the people to correct someone convicted of a crime by an unjust law. It allows for correcting (actual) political persecution.
This is a healthy thing.
That said. Fuck disenfranchisement. Directly fix that.
Local elections are not low stakes. Most of the services you receive are from the municipality you live in.
Just because they’re less polarizing doesn’t mean the stakes are lower.