They’d do just that. Then they’d employ ‘third parties’ (read: ‘shell companies’) that would do their biddings. That’s how its been done.

🎵 'TIS A CIRCLE OF LIFE~ 🎵

Despite not trying to fuck over my fellow online users, I do hate the GDPR as well, at least the current implementation. Now every stupid site ask for my ‘consent’. Some are maliciously compliant by taking half my browser view, and there’s nothing in that rule saying they cannot do that; hell, some even take so much space in only leave a sliver of the article just to be petty.

So basically like how the Linux kernel project does it. That’s fair.

Look, just try something already. All those fancy tools mean nothing to you if you’re not familiar with them.

For that, I’d recommend Linux Mint.

cry more

• adaptive cruise control
• AR HUD
• driving mode

None of these were meant to save lives

Also, both lane assist and auto emergency brakes are mostly poorly implemented. Even the ones that aren’t really bad don’t fare well with the chaos of the roads.

Also, voice assistant is bullshit. You know what would be better? That’s right, physical buttons.

Yum

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Just keep re-releasing sport games every year with updated lineups like you’ve been doing and you’ll be fine.

Highway to Hell

It’s a no brainer.

Good. Where?

Perhaps my grandchildren would spell it correctly.

You know, Windows98 is still available

on archive.org

I’ve done more cursing and bitching than I do an apology to objects I use.

I think they meant to ask if anyone else is owning the CCP under their thumb. If my assumption is true, OP sure is the prime minister.

In an airport’s baggage claim area, I accidentally hit a middle-aged guy with my luggage. There was like around 30 kilograms worth of stuff in there, going directly to his torso, bringing him to writhe in pain. In my defense, the guy was standing too close, and this was an intercontinental flight, so of course everyone’s bringing big-ass luggages. Regardless, I immediately apologized profusely.

Long time Debian user. First time really paying attention to their governance process.

What is this, a Monty Python skit? How the fuck are they gonna come with a consensus with all these choices?

There’s really just choices 1 & 2. The rest are just elaboration. And what the fuck is even ‘none of the above’?

Really, there’s just ‘yes’ and ‘no’. If it’s a ‘yes’, there would certainly be condition, which can come later. If it’s a ‘no’, who give a shit why; it’s a vote, not a fucking book club. They can definitely put the reason in the comment, but do they really need to put the reasons as the choice?