brain of a horse, speed of a man.
This is wrong on so many levels. We wouldn’t bother even using LLMs if they are were merely the “speed of a man”. And anybody who’s bothered to actually use the technology can tell you that’s it doesn’t have the “brain of a horse”.
Human review is still important, but the depth of knowledge they have is pretty damn advanced. The moment you completely remove the human element is where everything falls apart.
Also, who fucking cares about Howard Stern’s opinion on AI?
At this point, there’s so much bullshit from both sides on this issue that I don’t trust any of them.
I wouldn’t pollute my Linux OS with that shit.
In what way?
There has always been slop before AI slop.
This is such an incoherent counterpoint that I’m convinced this is just some form of trolling.
There’s so much information, misinformation, and random forum posts that using an search engine alone is hot garbage. And I’m not even talking about Google’s zero-click bullshit. Even using other search engines will only get you so far, so fast. Stack Overflow ain’t the resource it used to be, and even then, it was still rife with misinformation and noobs that didn’t know what the hell they were talking about.
The way I see it, there are two choices:
Whats stopping you from killing someone?
I have morals and ethics. But, not everybody does, and that’s why there’s prior enforcement to make the punishment a deterrent for the crime.
If there’s no enforcement, there’s no law.
Ain’t no war except class war.
It’s called “copyleft” for a reason.
In terms of murder, not every person is caught. But, enough of them are to deter the crime.
In terms of “no AI” enforcement, it’s not even a matter of perfection. It’s not possible to enforce except for the dumbest attempts, especially without also using AI to detect it. And if that enforcement comes about, then the evasion starts, and it’s hidden even further.
Wow, just speedrunning Godwin’s Law, aren’t we?
I guess I’m going to go back to work and talk to my five LLM sessions that are working on different tickets.
The entire point of GPL is to forcefully extract copyright out of the code in the first place.
I hate this attitude that if a rule or standard can’t be enforced perfectly, we shouldn’t strive for it.
This is the entire basis for the War on (some) Drugs. Guess what? Drugs won.
Power is nothing without enforceability, and purposely implementing rules or laws that can’t be enforceable is a form of malice and discrimination through selective enforcement.
You understand that car racing is the most blatantly advertised sport, or really, popular entity that ever exists, right? It’s been a running joke for decades how many sponsorships are plastered all over their cars and outfits.
Child sex crimes and child safety are topics that tend to short-circuit all reasonable objections,
Globally, there’s powers at work to get all kinds of “age verification” laws on the books, which we all know is just a thin excuse for de-anonymization and identity gathering. These same powers were fucking with Steam and Itch.io’s payment methods, because “what about the children”, which then ties to similar events with PornHub a few years earlier. Congress passed three different “Internet child safety” laws in the 2000s and 2010s, and all three were struck down by the Supreme Court for being unconstitutional. Decades earlier, DARE abused “child safety” justifications for personal gains.
This excuse is used all the time, and the emotional weight it carries makes it shocking effective to the proles that buy it at face value.
Benn Jordan did a good video about this:
Meanwhile, the US bond yield hits 5% for the first time since the housing crisis.