Isn’t there a surface specific kernel? https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface linux-surface/linux-surface: Linux Kernel for Surface Devices
Isn’t there a surface specific kernel? https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface linux-surface/linux-surface: Linux Kernel for Surface Devices


Also how old is this envy? Exact guide I followed. I built mine from source as I run Debian on that laptop.
I have an HP pavilion x360 from 2017. https://youtube.com/watch?v=FhJYj57qQCI


That’s really odd. I have a pavilion of similar age and I enabled secureboot without issue. Old HP and wifi is pain and suffering.


That’s fair. I have a 6800xt in my pc and I use that for my llm.
That said, I think I’m slightly misleading you. My current setup is not a 5825u. It’s my old laptop with an i7-8550u. I’m going to move it to the 5825u soon.


My isp hasn’t complained. I have fiber at my house and symmetrical gigabit. You should be fine if you transcode to reduce bandwidth needed as you still use your own internet. But I’m not running jellyfin on my home server.


This is why im doing my homelab on low powered processors (5825u NAS boards). Runs way cooler and is way more efficient. Same performance as my 9900kf gaming PC cpu wise.
Edit: this hasn’t happened yet
Dr. Stone technically counts


ISP provided equipment is also made outside of the US. This affects way more than just telecom stuff


No, that’s Chris Obi, you’re thinking of the guy from Rush Hour.
On voyager, it shows up as newline. That’s an odd one.



That’s actually super neat. They really buried the lead with that article headline.


I’m personally not pissed but I’m not sure if they’re missing something or not. Or just old fashioned ragebaiting. If it’s ragebaiting, they got me.


Which already has been redesigned by people who know what they’re doing. This is just someone making a minimalist phone.


I’m not sure if I’m missing something or not.
I was referring to the Arduino phone. In general you’re not wrong.
The scope of the conversation is just the phone itself.
Hardware was designed first, and then they applied software.
Edit: when I meant necessity for the cut down software. I meant it as in “the Arduino is barely fast enough to run the software, any extraneous thing needs to go”


Which already exists and has existed for ages.
Lineage os (Android), e/os (Android), postmarket os (straight up Linux) would all be excellent answers for cutdown/debloatable mobile phone OSes. (also Ubuntu touch and whatever the pinephone shipped with)
Its probably a lot harder making an unintrusive os than it is making this.
This is cutdown hardware leading to simplified and cutdown software as it’s a necessity here.


I wouldn’t consider it reinventing the wheel. Giant algae tanks to replace trees is reinventing the wheel. They’re just making a phone out of parts that would have originally been in a cheap phone at one point (before they got turned into development boards).
If I wanted to be super uncharitable, what the maker did was akin to this.


I think they’re having more fun making it than looking for a perfect solution. The fastest way to accomplish this is just buying some flipphone from Kyocera or something.
Also it’s a prototype. It wouldn’t survive in the real world in it’s current state.


You need to be able to relock the bootloader after flashing firmware. Pixels can do it and that’s it.
Can they make real cars and not stupid egg crossovers?