![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
What would they use Word for? This is about submitting data in their own standard formats in tiny files.
The real crime is that they’re not switching to online. Using optical discs is going to be even more ridiculous for those tiny files.
What would they use Word for? This is about submitting data in their own standard formats in tiny files.
The real crime is that they’re not switching to online. Using optical discs is going to be even more ridiculous for those tiny files.
Why do you want to use Shouko? Yeah it can bulk-tag anime but it doesn’t necessarily do a better job than Jellyfin with AniDB plugin. Also, it tends to hammer their API like an idiot and will get your user temp-banned or even perma-banned (depending on the size of your collection), while the Jellyfin plugin has rate limits.
I used it once when I was moving my collection to Jellyfin and I barely got my account back.
I would strongly suggest using just the regular Jellyfin plugins and adding titles to the directory in small batches and taking breaks if it stops recognizing them because it means the API is throttling you.
I still have Loki’s port of Rune around somewhere.
For me, educational stuff was all windows with a small amount of macs and I don’t think I ever saw a Linux system in actual use anywhere.
Linux systems started being common in CompSci schools around mid-90s, around the time LAMP took off (fun fact, Apache, MySQL and PHP were all launched in 1995).
Previously in CompSci you’d get to use all kinds of UNIX servers. My uni still had Solaris servers with dumb terminals, and I got my first sysadmin certification on SCO.UNIX / OpenServer.
They patch stuff like this fast because it’s a remote exploit. Local privilege escalation exploits are fixed much slower.
See if it’s the swap, disable zram and/or add a swap file.
Doesn’t have to be a swap partition, you can create a file, format it as swap and assign it in /etc/fstab.
Btw when you say you don’t have swap do you mean you don’t have regular swap file/partition (because you have zram swap) or you don’t have swap at all?
I am still hoping it will hit 10% market share within my life time.
Do we really want that?
We have it pretty good right now. I would actually say we’re living in a golden age of desktop Linux: there’s constant innovation, good support, you get to do pretty much everything you need, while flying under the radar.
Linux has won the majority of the industry (servers, mobile etc.) so it’s not like it has anything left to prove.
If it starts getting noticeable on the desktop I fear we’re just gonna get negative attention. Users who take and not contribute, because Windows had taught them to be entitled. Unwanted attention from Microsoft, who I bet are not going to be doing nice things once they start getting paranoid about it.
I really don’t think that large companies like Adobe will care about Linux even at 10% and even if they did, they are a super toxic company nowadays, the least we get to interact with them the better.
Many people have a warped understanding of what “two factor” means.
They conflate it with devices and they think it means that one of the factors (why one? which one? who knows) needs to be restricted to exactly one device.
What “two factor” really means is that you should have more than one required factor of authentication so that if one is compromised the attackers still can’t get in.
Ideally the factors should be spread across the “something you know” / “something you own” / “something you are” categories to complicate the manner in which they can be compromised.
We can only reliably rememeber a limited amount of passwords, so like it or not we have to use some devices at least some of the time.
The trouble with “something you own” is that it can be lost or damaged or stolen, and if you only have one of it then you’re fucked. So adding some redundancy is not a bad idea.
The larger issue is that everybody is stuck into extremely rigid and outdated mindsets that date back decades. “Two factors” don’t have to be exactly two, and they don’t have to include exactly one password, and so on. It should be fine if you wanted to secure your account with 3 passwords, and should be up to you if one of those password is a barcode tattooed on your taint so you need a mirror and to bend upside down to scan it.
Bottom line, use whatever you want and use your best judgment as to how secure is each factor. If you want to use something that syncs to multiple devices, go ahead. What you should consider is who has access to those devices and how it would affect you if they’re lost or stolen.
You can get a small Bluetooth keyboard. They make them really tiny, for this exact use case (smartphones and tablets).
Since this is a Surface you can probably find one that’s been specifically designed to integrate with it (act as a cover).
glib2-devel is available in Manjaro.
glib2-devel is present on all Manjaro branches.
glib2-devel is a core package and pacman should be able to install it directly. Have you updated your package mirrors and upgraded the system since you installed the machine?
Alright, have fun with that. 🙂
If you mean to do that in the public DNS records please note that public records that point at private IPs are often filtered by ISP’s DNS servers because they can be used in web attacks.
If you don’t use your ISP’s DNS as upstream, and the servers you use don’t do this filtering, and you don’t care about the attacks, carry on. But if you use multiple devices or have multiple users (with multiple devices each) eventually that domain will be blocked for some of them.
Generally speaking, a subdomain like jellyfin.myhome.com
will work out much better than a subpath like myhome.com/jellyfin
.
Very few web apps can deal well (or at all) with being used under a subpath.
It’s not. Series X and series S use native Bluetooth and work with xpadneo. Older controllers use their own proprietary receiver that needs to be plugged into the machine and work with regular xpad.
Probably a better idea would be to leave it archived. Whoever wants to take over can fork it and prove themselves by showing their work.
The xz debacle has shown that there are risk involved in an established developer endorsing an unknown one.
It will go through Google servers if you want to talk to an Android user… If Apple implemented RCS only for its own users there wouldn’t be much point to it. 🙂
You just need an app that does this transparently.
Oh wait, that’s why Google isn’t letting anybody else use RCS. 😄
Windows and DOS games started working well later, as WINE and DOS emulator were evolving.
But Linux had a thriving gaming scene of its own:
I’m only a casual gamer so this is just stuff I ran across occasionally, there was probably more.