![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Nope, he’s not the official nominee until after the convention. Still not gonna happen, but technically could.
Nope, he’s not the official nominee until after the convention. Still not gonna happen, but technically could.
Doesn’t the use of VoIP often make these hard to trace, as well?
Definitely did not.
And those recipe changes were probably aimed at lowering costs, not increasing quality.
There are a lot of entry level jobs that basically assume new employees know nothing, anyway. Seems like this will just further devalue degrees and emphasize work experience for hiring.
That’s true for soda and beer lines, too…
This doesn’t look like a woman without makeup, it looks like a woman with makeup with a filter over her face.
deleted by creator
This is true of a lot of large companies in general. The fact that they make money in spite of this shows how much the markets favor established players.
Really feels like one should be “tea is made from tea”
This country is so completely fucked.
When I was a youth they called that “coco puffs”
It’s state by state, I believe.
Every piece of software that’s available in Russia or China has to comply with their laws. Their laws are fucked up. This is also very easy to circumvent.
Sure, a lot of times they’re just letting other people lie through their products.
I really don’t think there are enough trans people competing at the highest levels to sustain that though.
“Drugs” are a pretty broad category of thing, it’s unlikely that you’re ever going to get an honest answer out of anyone, and it’s even more unlikely that anyone using illegal drugs who wants a gun is going to not buy a gun because of this. It’s just more war on drugs bullshit.
I’ll also add that if people were actually worried about the competency of people buying guns to own guns, then it would make far more sense to put the burden of proof on the person buying to prove their competency. But that’s not what this law is really about.
It’s kind of a shitty law in the first place, but he was assuredly guilty of it. It’s still unusual that they went after him for it when it wasn’t connected to any other crime (which is usually when federal prosecutors use this law) and really unusual that the judge threw out the plea bargain.
Funny how people elected under the two party system aren’t super motivated to change it.