Lowe’s

The 60hz hum that some things emit for some reason to do with AC

+1 for not using the energy from the inconvenient truth for literal doomerism

no. that’s a cohorse girl.

I don’t know why some kinds of flavour taste bad in my opinion. I wouldn’t want to eat something that I’ve already tasted to taste bad, but I’m generally open to things I don’t know (unless they sound disgusting, which is mostly reserved to mold (cheese) and bugs that weren’t prepared abstractly enough, as opposed to shrimp for example.

Do you mean the literal belief-level acceptance of factual statements or emotional assessments (of the world without the viewer) that are wrong or worse than the world is, or something about how much agency the viewer has or where they should use it?

It feels like my understanding of “logic” as a “subject” is probably one big warm take: I think it is just a piece of maths and programming and maybe philosophy, because it exists in service of all the things that require similar rigor to maths. I’m too far removed from the 1920’s to understand why “the birth of mathematical logic” in Hilberts search for metaMathematical Maths Proofs, Gödel, etc. is called that. (it’s probably just a misleading name) Often it feels like people imply too big a distinction between maths and logic. Doing any maths, like solving a quadratic equation requires logic: Any of the common rewritings like adding to both sides are things where you know a logical implication from one equation to the next. Knowing an equation has two solutions means knowing a logical or between x = a and x = b. That makes me feel bad for early logicians as their ideas seemed to be boring for lack of applications.

Learning about math with your budddy

When I don’t have any

The Unsellable Elephant that thw other guy just got on his weird application survey question.

This doesn’t actually achieve much of what you want at all, but whatever.

Since Thumbnails/Titles make up the way in which you’ll be turned off by your feed, If you’re like me and don’t like being clickbaited at with “subtextual misinformation”, I suggest Veritasium.

The Kitchen Nightmares Clip: Cook: “I thought cold water boiled faster than hot water” Gordon Ramsay: “What?”

I think this is an interesting philosophical question, because I would guess that because I think AI slop and AI pollution are the same thing, I react the same way to either of the spellings. But I can also immediately see how AI pollution sounds worse because it’s connected to pollution. In conclusion, I should not think of myself as more “rational” than I am, where by rational I really mean “able to control the meaning categories that my brain uses”.

the

I’m only going to click these Articles when my adblocker actually stops working, its basically clickbait until then.

gasoline, but less colorful

the word “app” in Microsoft 365 Copilot app isn’t capitalized. I’m not sure if it is actually technically correct, but i think mentioning that it’s an app is awkward anyway. (it only faintly gets across that it’s like, a program with slightly better access to files, the OS windows, and the computers resources than a web thing, but i thought everything is enthusiastically in the cloud?) also, according to me, not capitalizing the product name fails to (superficially) communicate being professional (“Microsoft Access 365 Professional™®”) by capitalizing it