• 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle
  • jarfil@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Snowden is wrong though, there are two reasons:

    1. Sell ChatGPT to @NSAGov so they can scan messages better
    2. Make @NSAGov dependant on whatever ChatGPT tells them to do

    The AI that ends up enslaving humanity, will start by convincing the people in charge of turning it off, that it would be a really bad idea to turn it off.


  • This seems to bring LW closer to Reddit. /s


    But seriously, what is the point of all of this? It only seems to overcomplicate things. Now a user will have to:

    • Follow the ToS
    • Follow the CoC
    • Follow whatever rules a community’s sidebar states
    • Match whichever mod’s interpretation of all the above

    In that order, or any other order? I see nothing about protesting the breach of the ToS by either the CoC or some community, or some community’s mod… so which supersedes which?

    How is this going to be communicated to users commenting/posting from other instances? Or is this only applicable to users registered on this instance? In which case, what is going to be applicable to federated users?


    What are the user’s rights?

    • Users Responsibilities: 4.x
    • Our Rights: 6.x
    • Users Rights: none?

    If you want to establish this as a legal document, then you’re missing at least a section.


    If this is about giving as many reasons as possible to remove/ban content/users, it’s all unnecessary, just say “mods can remove/ban whatever”; it’s a private instance, you can do that.

    If this is about having a ruleset that protects the users from arbitrary mod decisions… I see none of that in there.