![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ed9d3d5e-eabf-4d21-9cd0-e38884294037.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
*crickets chirping*
“The Trump administration in February 2020 negotiated a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban that excluded the Afghan government, freed 5,000 imprisoned Taliban soldiers and set a date certain of May 1, 2021, for the final withdrawal.”
“And the Trump administration kept to the pact, reducing U.S. troop levels from about 13,000 to 2,500, even though the Taliban continued to attack Afghan government forces and welcomed al-Qaeda terrorists into the Taliban leadership.”
What I care about isn’t the topic of discussion right now; you’re just trying to change the subject and avoiding the question.
Why are you pretending to care about genocide while actively campaigning for Trump? You know he admitted he would genocide harder and faster than Biden.
Like who?
They probably typed it out themself then screenshotted it.
Correction: 33% of the eligible voters.
66% of eligible voters voted in the 2020 election. Almost half of those voted for Trump. That’s 33% of eligible American voters.
Also, not all Americans are eligible to vote: felons in certain States, non-registered adults, children, etc.
I may just be being pedantic but it annoys me when I see people claim that half of America supports Trump/fascism when it’s just not true. The number is probably closer to 28% of Americans.
You always seem to avoid answering that question about Trump. You know he will be worse for Gaza yet you still seem to want to get him elected. Your real intentions are obvious; you don’t actually care about genocide.
Removed by mod
How often has a politician said they should be able to assassinate their political rivals?
“The idea was put forward by the former president’s lawyers earlier this week” (Jan. 2024)
the headline is pandering a lie.
Okay, I’ll bite… which part of the headline is a lie?
Wow, an even more reputable site than The Sun. You’ll believe anything that confirms what you’ve imagined to be true.
You remind me of the election deniers that claim to have mountains of evidence but absolutely refuse to share that evidence.
*crickets chirping*
You, one comment ago:
“I didnt read that guys self important comment fully to see if he really had any data in there.”
You now:
“you just make assumption based on no data, I am the opposite, I actually need data to make conclusions.”
So, you refuse to read the data conveniently provided to you, and also claim that you “actually need data to make conclusions.” You’re quickly losing any shred of credibility you have left.